Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Jan 23, 2023. It is now read-only.

JIT: fix ifdef guarding an assert#22460

Merged
AndyAyersMS merged 1 commit into
dotnet:masterfrom
AndyAyersMS:FixIfDef
Feb 8, 2019
Merged

JIT: fix ifdef guarding an assert#22460
AndyAyersMS merged 1 commit into
dotnet:masterfrom
AndyAyersMS:FixIfDef

Conversation

@AndyAyersMS
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

We use _TARGET_AMD64_, not _TARGET_X64_.

We use `_TARGET_AMD64_`, not `_TARGET_X64_`.
@AndyAyersMS
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Just something I randomly noticed...split off from early version of #22454

@BruceForstall PTAL
cc @dotnet/jit-contrib

@mikedn
Copy link
Copy Markdown

mikedn commented Feb 7, 2019

Sorry, I should have mentioned in my comment that I already cleaned up that code in #21711 so probably this isn't needed (though it will take a bit more for that PR to get out of WIP).

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@BruceForstall BruceForstall left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

You should trigger pri-1 x64 jobs, maybe including a couple stress, just to make sure the assert doesn't fire.

@AndyAyersMS
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@dotnet-bot test Windows_NT x64 Checked Build and Test
@dotnet-bot test Windows_NT x64 Checked jitstress1
@dotnet-bot test Windows_NT x64 Checked jitstress2
@dotnet-bot test Windows_NT x64 Checked minopts

@AndyAyersMS
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Might as well take this even if it may be shortly obsoleted....

@AndyAyersMS AndyAyersMS merged commit 76c322d into dotnet:master Feb 8, 2019
@AndyAyersMS AndyAyersMS deleted the FixIfDef branch February 8, 2019 16:10
picenka21 pushed a commit to picenka21/runtime that referenced this pull request Feb 18, 2022
We use `_TARGET_AMD64_`, not `_TARGET_X64_`.

Commit migrated from dotnet/coreclr@76c322d
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants