This repository was archived by the owner on Jan 23, 2023. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.6k
Delete fgArgTabEntry::node #24294
Merged
Merged
Delete fgArgTabEntry::node #24294
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
02ea463
Store the `this` call arg in the GenTreeCall::Use
mikedn 43b5dc4
Store gtCallThisArg in fgArgTabEntry
mikedn 765ea86
Do not store the node in fgArgTabEntry
mikedn dd0adb3
Cleanup fgArgInfo "copy constructor"
mikedn 106946d
Extract call compare code to a separate function
mikedn 843b2d2
Extra asserts
mikedn 8acfa36
Add UseIterator::GetUse()
mikedn File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
a random thing:
in
GenTreeCall::Use::SetNodewe check thatassert(node != nullptr);, so as I understand our contract is that if we have aUsethen we have a not-null node, but we don't check that in the Use constructor, so we can callGenTreeCall::Use(nullptr)and do bad things.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Right, I need to check this. AFAIR I didn't add an assert in the
Useconstructor due to some funny code infgArgInfo::fgArgInfothat was manufacturing uses out of thin air. That code is gone now so perhaps I can add an assert.