Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Jan 23, 2023. It is now read-only.

Add definition of "COMPLUS" to the glossary#260

Merged
mmitche merged 1 commit into
dotnet:masterfrom
henrybw:henrybw-define-complus
Feb 13, 2015
Merged

Add definition of "COMPLUS" to the glossary#260
mmitche merged 1 commit into
dotnet:masterfrom
henrybw:henrybw-define-complus

Conversation

@henrybw
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@henrybw henrybw commented Feb 13, 2015

In the same vein as "COR" and "URT", the terms "COM+"/"COMPLUS" appear frequently throughout the codebase, most notably in config settings (e.g. "COMPLUS_DefaultVersion"). I couldn't find any other explanation for what this means, and since I remember learning about it myself by asking older members of the team, I thought it would be helpful to have this documented for newcomers to the codebase.

Also, I'm not sure why WKS is showing up in the diff, but I can assure you that I did not touch it... (perhaps a linebreak discrepancy?)

In the same vein as "COR" and "URT", the terms "COM+"/"COMPLUS" appear frequently throughout the codebase, most notably in config settings (e.g. "COMPLUS_DefaultVersion"). I couldn't find any other explanation for what this means, and since I remember learning about it myself by asking older members of the team, I thought it would be helpful to have this documented for newcomers to the codebase.
@AlexGhiondea
Copy link
Copy Markdown

LGTM

@poizan42
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Maybe it should be mentioned that there is a COM+ that isn't .NET? https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms685978%28v=vs.85%29.aspx

@mmitche
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

mmitche commented Feb 13, 2015

I think he got that bit in there at the end. LGTM

mmitche added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 13, 2015
Add definition of "COMPLUS" to the glossary
@mmitche mmitche merged commit 7a8a135 into dotnet:master Feb 13, 2015
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants