-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.8k
WIP: Adding new SslStream API #11265
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ | ||
| <Project ToolsVersion="12.0" DefaultTargets="Build" xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/developer/msbuild/2003"> | ||
| <Import Project="..\dir.props" /> | ||
| <PropertyGroup> | ||
| <AssemblyVersion>4.0.1.0</AssemblyVersion> | ||
| <AssemblyVersion>4.1.0.0</AssemblyVersion> | ||
| </PropertyGroup> | ||
| </Project> | ||
|
|
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -9,9 +9,9 @@ | |
| "System.Threading.Tasks": "4.0.0" | ||
| }, | ||
| "frameworks": { | ||
| "netstandard1.3": { | ||
| "netstandard1.6": { | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. See #11321. Looks like this should be netstandard1.7 instead of netstandard1.6. (Currently docs are wrong).
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@weshaggard We just found out that the docs are wrong and that we should have listed it as netstandard1.7. Since that maps to .NET Framework 4.6.3 (vNext) and we plan to add this API there as well.
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Currently all the netstandard17 work is happening in the dev/api branch and is only a placeholder for now. We are going to soon be shifting to exposing APIs in .NET Core specifically first and then later adding them to netstandard. This enables people to add APIs just for .NET Core much more agile and not be blocked by our restrictions on .NET Standard. |
||
| "imports": [ | ||
| "dotnet5.4" | ||
| "dotnet5.5" | ||
| ] | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -9,7 +9,9 @@ | |
| <Platform Condition=" '$(Platform)' == '' ">AnyCPU</Platform> | ||
| <ProjectGuid>{A55A2B9A-830F-4330-A0E7-02A9FB30ABD2}</ProjectGuid> | ||
| <OutputType>Library</OutputType> | ||
| <NugetTargetMoniker>.NETStandard,Version=v1.3</NugetTargetMoniker> | ||
| <NuGetTargetMoniker>.NETCoreApp,Version=v1.1</NuGetTargetMoniker> | ||
|
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. If this is set to netcoreapp1.1 you need to have the matching section in your project.json file. |
||
| <!-- <NugetTargetMoniker>.NETStandard,Version=v1.3</NugetTargetMoniker> --> | ||
| <!-- <NugetTargetMoniker>.NETStandard,Version=v1.6</NugetTargetMoniker>--> | ||
| </PropertyGroup> | ||
| <PropertyGroup Condition=" '$(TargetsUnix)' == 'true' "> | ||
| <AllowUnsafeBlocks>true</AllowUnsafeBlocks> | ||
|
|
||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Has this going through the API review process?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not yet, why this is marked as WIP, do not merge.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes that is why I marked it as WIP/do not merge.
edit: Sorry I see you marked this one as such, I confused that with another PR I marked. For reference on the api process see http://aka.ms/apireview
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @weshaggard : will follow the process as soon as I can get it to build / test using the new package.