This repository was archived by the owner on Jan 23, 2023. It is now read-only.
Throw when ManagedHandler's ConnectHelper completes sync but unsuccessfully#25280
Merged
Conversation
Member
Author
|
@dotnet/dnceng, can you help me understand why the Windows x86 Release Build is showing as failed? |
|
LGTM |
Member
|
Taking a look at the infra logs @mmitche ? |
Member
Author
|
@dotnet-bot test Windows x86 Release Build please |
Dotnet-GitSync-Bot
pushed a commit
to Dotnet-GitSync-Bot/corefx
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 24, 2019
* Force secondary await continuations to run asynchronously For performance reasons, await continuations have been invoked synchronously, meaning they're invoked as part of the antecedent task's completion (as long as that task allows it, as long as there's sufficient stack space, etc.) This generally works out well in the case where there's a single await continuation, which is far and away the common case. However, it can cause problems in situations where there are multiple await continuations, as those continuations will end up being serialized, which can lead to slowdowns and deadlocks in niche situations. To address that, this commit backs off a bit. The first await continuation is still invoked synchronously, but subsequent await continuations are invoked asynchronously, such that they are not blocked by a previously registered await continuation. * Fix nits Signed-off-by: dotnet-bot <dotnet-bot@microsoft.com>
stephentoub
added a commit
to Dotnet-GitSync-Bot/corefx
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 25, 2019
* Force secondary await continuations to run asynchronously For performance reasons, await continuations have been invoked synchronously, meaning they're invoked as part of the antecedent task's completion (as long as that task allows it, as long as there's sufficient stack space, etc.) This generally works out well in the case where there's a single await continuation, which is far and away the common case. However, it can cause problems in situations where there are multiple await continuations, as those continuations will end up being serialized, which can lead to slowdowns and deadlocks in niche situations. To address that, this commit backs off a bit. The first await continuation is still invoked synchronously, but subsequent await continuations are invoked asynchronously, such that they are not blocked by a previously registered await continuation. * Fix nits Signed-off-by: dotnet-bot <dotnet-bot@microsoft.com>
stephentoub
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 25, 2019
* Force secondary await continuations to run asynchronously For performance reasons, await continuations have been invoked synchronously, meaning they're invoked as part of the antecedent task's completion (as long as that task allows it, as long as there's sufficient stack space, etc.) This generally works out well in the case where there's a single await continuation, which is far and away the common case. However, it can cause problems in situations where there are multiple await continuations, as those continuations will end up being serialized, which can lead to slowdowns and deadlocks in niche situations. To address that, this commit backs off a bit. The first await continuation is still invoked synchronously, but subsequent await continuations are invoked asynchronously, such that they are not blocked by a previously registered await continuation. * Fix nits Signed-off-by: dotnet-bot <dotnet-bot@microsoft.com>
picenka21
pushed a commit
to picenka21/runtime
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 18, 2022
…sfully (dotnet/corefx#25280) Commit migrated from dotnet/corefx@c280881
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
#23115 (comment)
cc: @geoffkizer