-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.4k
Fix Parameter for primitive collections for IEnumerable with nullable type #37255
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks odd - you're doing ToList on the enumerable (into
values), only to then iterate overvaluesand populate another list from it (processedValues); any reason to not just doforeachon the IEnumerable (instead of theforjust below), and populateprocessedValuesdirectly from that, skipping the additionalvaluescopy in the middle?(the one problem with this is the we'd move the generic list creation with MakeGenericType out and do it always, as opposed to only when there's a NULL today. But MakeGenericType is a single constant cost, whereas doing another ToList is O(N)).
BTW doing a
ToList()like this would indeed make sense if it prevented double-enumeration of the enumerable (since enumerating an enumerable can be arbitrarily heavy, depending on what it actually does). However, the change as proposed here doesn't seem to prevent double-enumeration anyway: if no NULL is encountered, we just exit below (processedValues is null), and the enumerable will be enumerated again at some point later.Finally, ideally enumerables would be enumerable/materialized very early on - in the funcletizer - so that can later just assume we have a List everywhere. That would prevent us from having to worry about this in every single place in the query pipeline. I think that would be my preferred fix.
Note: I could see your ToList solution making sense for the patch, to really keep the change super-minimal. But for 11 let's discuss the best way forward.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Honestly I never understood the lazy creating of
processedValues...