Skip to content

Conversation

@dsyme
Copy link
Contributor

@dsyme dsyme commented Jun 17, 2021

Reverting #11407 and #11685 due to extra implicit allocations noted in #11407 (comment)

@dsyme
Copy link
Contributor Author

dsyme commented Jun 17, 2021

Don't merge this just yet, will look for a fix

@vzarytovskii
Copy link
Member

Should be fixed by #11687, right?

@dsyme
Copy link
Contributor Author

dsyme commented Jun 17, 2021

Closing in favour of #11687 and #11690

@dsyme dsyme closed this Jun 17, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants