Skip to content

[xharness] Automatically generate xharness make dependencies. #8324

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
rolfbjarne merged 1 commit into from
Apr 13, 2020
Merged

[xharness] Automatically generate xharness make dependencies. #8324

rolfbjarne merged 1 commit into from
Apr 13, 2020

Conversation

@rolfbjarne
Copy link
Member

@rolfbjarne rolfbjarne commented Apr 8, 2020

No description provided.

@chamons chamons requested a review from mandel-macaque April 8, 2020 15:02
@mandel-macaque
Copy link
Contributor

mandel-macaque commented Apr 8, 2020

You read my mind.

@monojenkins
Copy link
Collaborator

monojenkins commented Apr 8, 2020

Build success
✅ Build succeeded
✅ API Diff (from stable)
✅ API Diff (from PR only) (no change)
✅ Generator Diff (no change)
✅ Test run succeeded

@rolfbjarne rolfbjarne merged commit f3ee011 into dotnet:master Apr 13, 2020
@rolfbjarne rolfbjarne added the not-notes-worthy Ignore for release notes label Apr 13, 2020
mandel-macaque pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 12, 2020
@rolfbjarne @mandel-macaque
[xharness] Automatically generate xharness make dependencies. (#8324)
8d7295c
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@chamons chamons Awaiting requested review from chamons

2 more reviewers

@spouliot spouliot spouliot approved these changes

@mandel-macaque mandel-macaque mandel-macaque approved these changes

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

not-notes-worthy Ignore for release notes

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@rolfbjarne @mandel-macaque @monojenkins @spouliot