Skip to content

Conversation

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot commented May 31, 2024

Backport of #102934 to release/9.0-preview5

The fix in #102876 was not enough to resolve the problem so we've decided to not set the problematic feature flag to enable p5 to ship

/cc @lewing

Customer Impact

Any project using using these runtime feature flags will not work with the latest System.Text.Json

  • Customer reported
  • Found internally

[Select one or both of the boxes. Describe how this issue impacts customers, citing the expected and actual behaviors and scope of the issue. If customer-reported, provide the issue number.]

Regression

  • Yes
  • No

[If yes, specify when the regression was introduced. Provide the PR or commit if known.]

Testing

[How was the fix verified? How was the issue missed previously? What tests were added?]

Risk

[High/Medium/Low. Justify the indication by mentioning how risks were measured and addressed.]

IMPORTANT: If this backport is for a servicing release, please verify that:

  • The PR target branch is release/X.0-staging, not release/X.0.

  • If the change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, you have added the necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

@ghost ghost added the needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners label May 31, 2024
@lewing lewing added Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review area-Workloads Workloads like wasm-tools and removed needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners labels May 31, 2024
@lewing lewing requested review from sebastienros and steveisok May 31, 2024 22:08
@lewing lewing requested a review from mmitche May 31, 2024 22:16
@sebastienros
Copy link
Member

I had prepared an email for tactics approval but waited as @eiriktsarpalis had some questions about the change. As product owners do you feel confident with this change and want me to send the email? Also asking because the change in main hasn't been merged in main and doesn't even require tactics approval.

@eiriktsarpalis
Copy link
Member

Wouldn't this change result in size regression?

@lewing lewing added Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release and removed Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review labels Jun 4, 2024
@lewing lewing merged commit 4049205 into release/9.0-preview5 Jun 4, 2024
@lewing
Copy link
Member

lewing commented Jun 4, 2024

Wouldn't this change result in size regression?

Yes, we don't expect it to be substantial and if it is we can address it after preview 5

@lewing lewing deleted the backport/pr-102934-to-release/9.0-preview5 branch June 4, 2024 17:13
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 5, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-Workloads Workloads like wasm-tools Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants