Skip to content

Conversation

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot commented Jun 17, 2025

Backport of #116707 to release/10.0-preview6

/cc @jkoritzinsky

Customer Impact

  • Customer reported
  • Found internally

[Select one or both of the boxes. Describe how this issue impacts customers, citing the expected and actual behaviors and scope of the issue. If customer-reported, provide the issue number.]

When the user tries to use HttpClient in their .NET on iOS, .NET on tvOS, .NET on Mac Catalyst, or .NET on Android app, a BadImageFormatException is thrown instead of the operation being successful.

Regression

  • Yes
  • No

[If yes, specify when the regression was introduced. Provide the PR or commit if known.]

da80937

Testing

[How was the fix verified? How was the issue missed previously? What tests were added?]

Local validation

Risk

[High/Medium/Low. Justify the indication by mentioning how risks were measured and addressed.]

Low, manually validated

IMPORTANT: If this backport is for a servicing release, please verify that:

  • The PR target branch is release/X.0-staging, not release/X.0.

Package authoring no longer needed in .NET 9

IMPORTANT: Starting with .NET 9, you no longer need to edit a NuGet package's csproj to enable building and bump the version.
Keep in mind that we still need package authoring in .NET 8 and older versions.

@jkoritzinsky
Copy link
Member

@jonathanpeppers will the change you made for the return type be in P6 or do we need to add back the return type adjustment here?

@jonathanpeppers
Copy link
Member

@jonathanpeppers will the change you made for the return type be in P6 or do we need to add back the return type adjustment here?

We haven’t branched for preview 6 just yet, so it will be there.

@jkoritzinsky jkoritzinsky added the Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review label Jun 17, 2025
Copy link
Member

@jeffschwMSFT jeffschwMSFT left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm. we will take for consideration in 10 preview 6

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants