-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.3k
Fix ManagedNtlm on big-endian architectures #124598
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
ShreyaLaxminarayan
wants to merge
2
commits into
dotnet:main
Choose a base branch
from
ShreyaLaxminarayan:ntlm
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -302,8 +302,9 @@ private static unsafe void CreateNtlmNegotiateMessage(Span<byte> asBytes, Flags | |
| asBytes.Clear(); | ||
| NtlmHeader.CopyTo(asBytes); | ||
| message.Header.MessageType = MessageType.Negotiate; | ||
| message.Flags = requiredFlags; | ||
| message.Flags = BitConverter.IsLittleEndian ? requiredFlags : (Flags)BinaryPrimitives.ReverseEndianness((uint)requiredFlags); | ||
| message.Version = s_version; | ||
| if (!BitConverter.IsLittleEndian) message.Version.ProductBuild = (ushort)BinaryPrimitives.ReverseEndianness((ushort)message.Version.ProductBuild); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| private static unsafe int GetFieldLength(MessageField field) | ||
|
|
@@ -486,7 +487,7 @@ private byte[] ProcessTargetInfo(ReadOnlySpan<byte> targetInfo, out DateTime tim | |
|
|
||
| if (ID == AvId.Timestamp) | ||
| { | ||
| time = DateTime.FromFileTimeUtc(BitConverter.ToInt64(info.Slice(4, 8))); | ||
| time = DateTime.FromFileTimeUtc(BinaryPrimitives.ReadInt64LittleEndian(info.Slice(4, 8))); | ||
| } | ||
| else if (ID == AvId.TargetName || ID == AvId.ChannelBindings) | ||
| { | ||
|
|
@@ -628,8 +629,9 @@ private static byte[] DeriveKey(ReadOnlySpan<byte> exportedSessionKey, ReadOnlyS | |
| NtlmHeader.CopyTo(responseAsSpan); | ||
|
|
||
| response.Header.MessageType = MessageType.Authenticate; | ||
| response.Flags = s_requiredFlags | (flags & Flags.NegotiateSeal); | ||
| response.Flags = BitConverter.IsLittleEndian ? (s_requiredFlags | (flags & Flags.NegotiateSeal)) : (Flags)BinaryPrimitives.ReverseEndianness((uint)(s_requiredFlags | (flags & Flags.NegotiateSeal)));; | ||
| response.Version = s_version; | ||
| if (!BitConverter.IsLittleEndian) response.Version.ProductBuild = BinaryPrimitives.ReverseEndianness((ushort)response.Version.ProductBuild); | ||
|
|
||
| // Calculate hash for hmac - same for lm2 and ntlm2 | ||
| Span<byte> ntlm2hash = stackalloc byte[DigestLength]; | ||
|
|
@@ -662,7 +664,8 @@ private static byte[] DeriveKey(ReadOnlySpan<byte> exportedSessionKey, ReadOnlyS | |
|
|
||
| // Derive session base key | ||
| Span<byte> sessionBaseKey = stackalloc byte[HMACMD5.HashSizeInBytes]; | ||
| int sessionKeyWritten = HMACMD5.HashData(ntlm2hash, responseAsSpan.Slice(response.NtChallengeResponse.PayloadOffset, 16), sessionBaseKey); | ||
| var payloadSlice = (BitConverter.IsLittleEndian) ? responseAsSpan.Slice(response.NtChallengeResponse.PayloadOffset, 16) : responseAsSpan.Slice(BinaryPrimitives.ReverseEndianness(response.NtChallengeResponse.PayloadOffset), 16); | ||
|
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I would probably get correct PayloadOffset value first instead of duplicating the whole Slice block. But that is mostly style and readability preference. |
||
| int sessionKeyWritten = HMACMD5.HashData(ntlm2hash, payloadSlice, sessionBaseKey); | ||
| Debug.Assert(sessionKeyWritten == HMACMD5.HashSizeInBytes); | ||
|
|
||
| // Encrypt exportedSessionKey with sessionBaseKey | ||
|
|
||
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am not a big fan of those manual branches. For one, when you look at
message.Flagsusing a debugger, the value will be misrepresented on BE systems, and if you miss one place, you end up with hard to debug bugs. Other questions arise from looking at the code like why do we reverse some properties and not others....Can we modify the definition of NegotiateMessage to have setter/getter of those properties handle the endianness difference transparently to the caller?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Out of the fields that are set for NegotiateMessage, message.Header.MessageType is a byte and is represented the same in little-endian and big-endian. Flags is an uint and needs to be endian specific. Version is a struct with ProductBuild as ushort and the rest are bytes, and hence only ProductBuild needs to be reversed. I will implement it using getters and setters.