Use no-recent-activity in inactive Draft PRs

[eiriktsarpalis]

Following feedback from #65101 (comment) this updates Draft PR auto closing automation to use the no-recent-activity label workflow. Stale PRs will be issued a warning before being closed automatically 14 days later.

[marek-safar]

Not a fan of this change with a label after 14 days. If you think this can change things we should just post a comment with a warning a few days before closing Draft PR.

[danmoseley]

I have no opinion on the timeline, just that it seems worth posting a note a little beforehand.

[eiriktsarpalis]

Note that the 14/14 day timing is consistent with what we already have in inactive issues and pull requests. No strong opinion on what should be used instead but it should probably be consistent across the board.

[marek-safar]

Not sure what is the goal with consistency here if we are doing a very different action here. Either way, I still think that 14 days is too long and the label has no value on Draft PRs and will make real no-recent-activity filtering harder.

[eiriktsarpalis]

I still think that 14 days is too long

FWIW the existing rule closes issues after 30 days of no activity, so other than providing an early warning not much is being changed here.

[ghost]

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-meta
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

---

Following feedback from #65101 (comment) this updates Draft PR auto closing automation to use the no-recent-activity label workflow. Stale PRs will be issued a warning before being closed automatically 14 days later.

Author:	eiriktsarpalis
Assignees:	eiriktsarpalis
Labels:	area-Meta
Milestone:	-

[eiriktsarpalis]

What should we do with this PR? Close it?

[danmoseley]

Giving a heads up seems like a positive move. We can consider changing to close them faster in future.