[RISC-V] Fix build error

[clamp03]

• Fixed build error due to no return value in non-void function (ins_Move_Extend)
• CoreCLR RISC-V architecture port #84834

[ghost]

Tagging subscribers to this area: @JulieLeeMSFT, @jakobbotsch
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

---

• Fixed build error due to no return value in non-void function (ins_Move_Extend)
• CoreCLR RISC-V architecture port #84834

Author:	clamp03
Assignees:	-
Labels:	area-CodeGen-coreclr, community-contribution
Milestone:	-

[shushanhf]

This PR is after LoongArch64's #85216 and conflict.
It should be pushed later.

This is just a duplication of #85216, so I had merged it to #85216.

By the way, if you just a duplication of LoongArch64, please don't push RISCV before LoongArch64 merged to avoid conflicting.

[clamp03]

This PR is after LoongArch64's #85216 and conflict. It should be pushed later.

This is just a duplication of #85216, so I had merged it to #85216.

By the way, if you just a duplication of LoongArch64, please don't push RISCV before LoongArch64 merged to avoid conflicting.

@shushanhf Thank you. When I saw this build error, before fixing this error, I searched and found your patch which fix only LA64. So I pushed this for RISC64. If it conflicts, then I would fix conflicts. Actually, someone's patches can be conflict with mine. I don't care and just fix it. I cannot prevent all PRs from others.

Do you have any plan to add CI for LA64? I think LA64 build and tests frequently fails. (RISC-V too. 😢 ) It already occurs 8 times #85216, #85151, #85140, #84971, #84970, #84970, #84960 and #83370 for only March and April. Unfortunately, we did 2 times. I am very sorry about that. However, we cannot prevent all mistakes even if we really carefully check. I think CI is very good option to keep LA64 safely. If you don't mind, I can help. Could you please let me know how to build LA64?
For RISC-V, patches are ready for build CI with helps of community members (thank you @am11). dotnet/dotnet-buildtools-prereqs-docker#854 and clamp03@8b2d357

[shushanhf]

Do you have any plan to add CI for LA64? I think LA64 build and tests frequently fails. (RISC-V too. )

We have constructed a local CI for LA64.
I will add LA64's CI to community later. Because I am busying with amending the LA64‘s code.

Thanks

[clamp03]

@shushanhf One more notification, I fixed an error in RISC-V. bed8b9c. When optimizing branch is applied, the patch reverses condition in GT_JCMP. In my opinion, it is related to LA64 too. If you think it needs for LA64 ASAP, you can copy codes for LA64 and make another PR. I will resolve a conflict in my side. I think it takes long time to merge my PR. :)

+ From next time, if you don't mind, I hope requesting you to add RISCV if your patch is useful for both LA64 and RISCV. And I will add you as a CC if my PR is good for both LA64 and RISCV. I think we have many things we can share and help.
Thank you.

[shushanhf]

@shushanhf One more notification, I fixed an error in RISC-V. bed8b9c. When optimizing branch is applied, the patch reverses condition in GT_JCMP. In my opinion,

We had already fixed this for LA64.