Rename SdkSupportedTargetPlatform, add SupportedTargetPlatform#12872
Conversation
terrajobst
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We should name the group SupportedPlatform but other than that, it looks good.
|
@sfoslund @dsplaisted will this be merged before 3? |
Let's not do a fire drill this week. But we should get it in soon-ish. |
Experimenting to see what happens if I edit a different repo
pranavkm
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@dsplaisted would you mind reviewing this?
|
Need to adjust against #12775 |
@terrajobst sorry, I was OOF at the beginning of this week. I'll update based on feedback now and get this in this week. |
|
I think @pranavkm mentioned he was going to take a look at this too--but I'm not sure if he took any actions on it yet. |
|
I edited some of these files, but looks like @sfoslund's got a handle on this 👍 |
|
@dsplaisted @terrajobst does this look okay to you? |
Yes, but I'd like clarification from @wli3 on what he meant in this comment |
|
Now I look it in detail. This change has nothing to do with the attribute "SupportedOSPlatformAttribute" in #12775 right? And this rename is to avoid that name conflict. If so, this is good. |
Logically related, but independent. This item group is only used by our analyzer. @mavasani what is required to pass this down? Do we need to register the item group somewhere? Or did you do that already? |
|
I presume you mean: dotnet/roslyn-analyzers#3950 (comment)? |
|
@mavasani things are good on your side for this to go in then? |
I am not sure I understand the changes in this PR, but updating the analyzers to understand any name chosen here would be a trivial change, so in that sense this PR does not break or hinder the analyzers in anyway. |
|
Great, sounds like this is good to go in then. I'll merge it today unless there are any objections. |
Fixes #12706
cc @terrajobst