Query language: Support "has no key like"

[westnordost]

What already exists is [!key] and [~kexRegex]. What is missing is [!~keyRegex] or similar to check if an element has no key that matches with the regex tagged.

Example use cases:

• Check if a recycling container is not tagged with any recycleable it accepts: [!~'^recycling:.*$'].
• Check if the road has no cycleway tagged: !~'^cycleway(:left|:right|:both)?$'
• There are other such schemes as the recycling scheme, at least I think for services provided at car shops, boat shops, motorcycle shops

[mmd-osm]

This wasn't implemented for performance reasons, as it would be prohibitively expensive. I would have to look up a reference to a previous discussion on this topic if needed.

I could find some discussion on this topic in #59 (comment), but I don't find the performance hint anymore...

[westnordost]

Ok, I understand

[westnordost]

Ah wait, but perhaps as an evaluator in an if condition?

if: hasTagLike("^recycling:.*$")

[mmd-osm]

Evaluators don't support any regular expressions at this time...

[westnordost]

Ok. But if they do in the future, that might be a thing to consider.

[westnordost]

I further worked on the "element filter syntax" used by StreetComplete by the way and found that for everything I need to conveniently support these extensions exists in OQL 👍

[mmd-osm]

Found this commit: the XML query language rejects regular expressions on keys w/ negation: 7209dd3

[mmd-osm]

Just wanted to mention that you would typically use a difference statement in this case:

(nwr[recycling]->.a; - nwr.a[~"^recycling:."~"."];);
out meta center;

[westnordost]

Yes, this is how I currently do it

[mmd-osm]

Yeah, I know :) this was meant as hint to people who found this issue via some web search.

[drolbr]

I do not see any inevitable performance problem here. When other conditionals restrict the result set or the expression is sufficiently broadly (think of way[!~"."~"."], finding all ways without any tag) then it is probably fine.

It is just not a high priority.