Skip to content

MAG Quality #6

@DeaconOfBiology

Description

@DeaconOfBiology

First, thanks for the great program!

I was reading through your manuscript for MetaCC and I see that you called any MAG greater than or equal to 50% and contamination less than or equal to 10% as high-quality. However, these are not the community standards laid out in this paper (https://www.nature.com/articles/nbt.3893). I am wondering if a different standard was chosen just because or if it was chosen due to these being HiC based MAGs? Thanks for any clarification you can provide!

Best,
TJ

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions