Skip to content

Conversation

@AlexanderLanin
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Lanin <Alexander.Lanin@etas.com>
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 4, 2025

License Check Results

🚀 The license check job ran with the Bazel command:

bazel run //src:license-check

Status: ⚠️ Needs Review

Click to expand output
[License Check Output]
Extracting Bazel installation...
Starting local Bazel server (8.3.0) and connecting to it...
INFO: Invocation ID: 9aba5193-6931-4abc-af0a-f1cef8187f4e
Computing main repo mapping: 
Computing main repo mapping: 
Computing main repo mapping: 
Loading: 
Loading: 0 packages loaded
Loading: 0 packages loaded
    currently loading: src
Analyzing: target //src:license-check (1 packages loaded, 0 targets configured)
Analyzing: target //src:license-check (1 packages loaded, 0 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //src:license-check (71 packages loaded, 9 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //src:license-check (113 packages loaded, 732 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //src:license-check (129 packages loaded, 2435 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //src:license-check (137 packages loaded, 4485 targets configured)

INFO: Analyzed target //src:license-check (137 packages loaded, 4500 targets configured).
INFO: Found 1 target...
Target //src:license.check.license_check up-to-date:
  bazel-bin/src/license.check.license_check
  bazel-bin/src/license.check.license_check.jar
INFO: Elapsed time: 12.588s, Critical Path: 0.60s
INFO: 13 processes: 3 disk cache hit, 9 internal, 1 processwrapper-sandbox.
INFO: Build completed successfully, 13 total actions
INFO: Running command line: bazel-bin/src/license.check.license_check src/formatted.txt <args omitted>
usage: org.eclipse.dash.licenses.cli.Main [-batch <int>] [-cd <url>]
       [-confidence <int>] [-ef <url>] [-excludeSources <sources>] [-help] [-lic
       <url>] [-project <shortname>] [-repo <url>] [-review] [-summary <file>]
       [-timeout <seconds>] [-token <token>]

Copy link

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR bumps the module version from 2.1.0 to 2.2.0 in the MODULE.bazel file, following semantic versioning conventions. This is a minor version increment, suggesting new features or enhancements have been added while maintaining backward compatibility.

Key Changes

  • Updated module version from "2.1.0" to "2.2.0" in MODULE.bazel

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

module(
name = "score_docs_as_code",
version = "2.1.0",
version = "2.2.0",
Copy link

Copilot AI Dec 4, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The documentation in docs/how-to/setup.md line 26 still references version "2.0.3" in the installation example. This should be updated to "2.2.0" to match the new module version being released, ensuring users install the correct version.

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

correct! next pr

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 4, 2025

The created documentation from the pull request is available at: docu-html

@AlexanderLanin AlexanderLanin merged commit 7a600ff into main Dec 5, 2025
19 checks passed
@AlexanderLanin AlexanderLanin deleted the AlexanderLanin-patch-1 branch December 5, 2025 07:28
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Draft to Done in Infrastructure Dec 5, 2025
ramceb pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 10, 2025
Signed-off-by: Alexander Lanin <Alexander.Lanin@etas.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants