Skip to content

Conversation

@a-zw
Copy link
Contributor

@a-zw a-zw commented Dec 10, 2025

Copies documentation from platform score repository into persistency repo.

Some ids required renaming because for now the duplicates in platform repo are still there.

a-zw added 3 commits December 1, 2025 14:14
We have component requirements now which shall reference those.
Rename some ids because of their duplicates in platform
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 10, 2025

License Check Results

🚀 The license check job ran with the Bazel command:

bazel run //:license-check

Status: ⚠️ Needs Review

Click to expand output
[License Check Output]
Extracting Bazel installation...
Starting local Bazel server (8.3.0) and connecting to it...
INFO: Invocation ID: 309955d5-4574-4b80-9274-ec0ef750e3ba
Computing main repo mapping: 
Computing main repo mapping: 
Computing main repo mapping: 
Computing main repo mapping: 
Computing main repo mapping: 
DEBUG: Rule 'rust_qnx8_toolchain+' indicated that a canonical reproducible form can be obtained by modifying arguments integrity = "sha256-oEubHgeZDdT0svMmBKJx7c3/2TdSI/vfwRUyDn+TPGA="
DEBUG: Repository rust_qnx8_toolchain+ instantiated at:
  <builtin>: in <toplevel>
Repository rule http_archive defined at:
  /home/runner/.bazel/external/bazel_tools/tools/build_defs/repo/http.bzl:394:31: in <toplevel>
Computing main repo mapping: 
Computing main repo mapping: 
Computing main repo mapping: 
WARNING: For repository 'score_process', the root module requires module version score_process@1.3.2, but got score_process@1.4.0 in the resolved dependency graph. Please update the version in your MODULE.bazel or set --check_direct_dependencies=off
Loading: 
Loading: 5 packages loaded
Loading: 5 packages loaded
    currently loading: 
Analyzing: target //:license-check (6 packages loaded, 0 targets configured)
Analyzing: target //:license-check (6 packages loaded, 0 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (88 packages loaded, 10 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (129 packages loaded, 350 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (157 packages loaded, 2965 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (162 packages loaded, 3014 targets configured)

INFO: Analyzed target //:license-check (165 packages loaded, 5030 targets configured).
[6 / 14] [Prepa] Creating source manifest for @@score_tooling+//dash/tool/formatters:dash_format_converter [for tool]
INFO: From Generating Dash formatted dependency file ...:
INFO: Successfully converted 62 packages from Cargo.lock to bazel-out/k8-fastbuild/bin/formatted.txt
INFO: Found 1 target...
Target //:license.check.license_check up-to-date:
  bazel-bin/license.check.license_check
  bazel-bin/license.check.license_check.jar
INFO: Elapsed time: 21.952s, Critical Path: 0.32s
INFO: 14 processes: 5 disk cache hit, 9 internal.
INFO: Build completed successfully, 14 total actions
INFO: Running command line: bazel-bin/license.check.license_check ./formatted.txt <args omitted>
usage: org.eclipse.dash.licenses.cli.Main [-batch <int>] [-cd <url>]
       [-confidence <int>] [-ef <url>] [-excludeSources <sources>] [-help] [-lic
       <url>] [-project <shortname>] [-repo <url>] [-review] [-summary <file>]
       [-timeout <seconds>] [-token <token>]

@github-actions
Copy link

The created documentation from the pull request is available at: docu-html

Copy link
Contributor

@arkjedrz arkjedrz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  • Please make sure this is aligned with eclipse-score/score#2001 (review)
  • Will links be named back to proper ones once redundant files in score repo are removed?
  • Is there an adjacent PR to score repo removing those files?

a-zw added a commit to etas-contrib/score_score that referenced this pull request Dec 15, 2025
They are now in the persistency module: eclipse-score/persistency#188

Note that persistency feature docs are still here.
@a-zw a-zw force-pushed the migrate-module-docs branch from 4a51b08 to 86530d1 Compare December 15, 2025 09:53
@a-zw
Copy link
Contributor Author

a-zw commented Dec 15, 2025

@arkjedrz your feedback is addressed: The referenced PR is merged and the contents here are updated.

@arkjedrz
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM, but two questions remain:

  • Will links be named back to proper ones once redundant files in score repo are removed?
  • Is there an adjacent PR to score repo removing those files?

@a-zw
Copy link
Contributor Author

a-zw commented Dec 15, 2025

@arkjedrz

@vinodreddy-g vinodreddy-g self-requested a review January 5, 2026 12:32
@vinodreddy-g
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM , we can merge it after the feature team meeting this thursday.

@vinodreddy-g vinodreddy-g merged commit 96c8441 into eclipse-score:main Jan 7, 2026
14 checks passed
FScholPer pushed a commit to eclipse-score/score that referenced this pull request Jan 8, 2026
They are now in the persistency module: eclipse-score/persistency#188

Note that persistency feature docs are still here.
@a-zw a-zw deleted the migrate-module-docs branch January 8, 2026 09:22
olivembo pushed a commit to etas-contrib/score_score that referenced this pull request Jan 8, 2026
They are now in the persistency module: eclipse-score/persistency#188

Note that persistency feature docs are still here.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants