Skip to content

Conversation

@aschemmel-tech
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@github-actions
Copy link

The created documentation from the pull request is available at: docu-html

@aschemmel-tech aschemmel-tech marked this pull request as ready for review September 30, 2025 06:54
Copy link
Contributor

@masc2023 masc2023 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Needs discussion

@aschemmel-tech aschemmel-tech force-pushed the aschemmel-tech-reqeng-std-req-links branch from 6c103ff to 115f815 Compare September 30, 2025 10:55
PandaeDo
PandaeDo previously approved these changes Sep 30, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@PandaeDo PandaeDo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good for me

Tailoring
=========

.. gd_guidl:: Requirements Tailored
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Here we have other guidelines only for safety too https://github.com/eclipse-score/process_description/blob/115f815582bd3dd5222ea8416f158e11eeb3a29e/process/process_areas/safety_management/guidance/guideline_safety_management.rst, is this not a better place?

Otherwise this should be more general, we may add later tailoring from security and quality standard too here, or not?

in the platform safety plan for your project if following the same approach as S-CORE,
to be able to demonstrate completeness as described in :need:`gd_guidl__saf_package`.
This work product "definition" links to all the work products which are not covered by the
processes work products documented. Make sure these are tailored out in the safety plan
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

if you add here link to the Safety Plan Template/Guideline and or work product, which should contain them, I think then you come automatically also to the requirements tailoring topic again, if is not better in the Safety Plan Guideline?

@masc2023 masc2023 merged commit 055b503 into main Oct 2, 2025
5 checks passed
@masc2023 masc2023 deleted the aschemmel-tech-reqeng-std-req-links branch October 2, 2025 07:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants