Skip to content

Conversation

@aschemmel-tech
Copy link
Contributor

Resolves: score/#1018

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 1, 2025

The created documentation from the pull request is available at: docu-html

@aschemmel-tech aschemmel-tech marked this pull request as ready for review October 1, 2025 11:28
:satisfies: wf__req_feat_req, wf__req_comp_req

It shall be checked if every feature- and component requirement is linked at least to one valid architectural element on the same level.
This should also include requirement type checking:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hard to read, please reformat it, e.g. as list

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

changed

* - Requirements Type
- The requirement type defines which category the requirement relates to. Following categories are defined: [Functional, Interface, Process, Legal, Non-Functional]
- The requirement type defines which category the requirement relates to. Following categories are defined: [Functional, Interface, Process, Non-Functional]
Note that the linking to the requirements is affected by these types, see :need:`gd_req__req_linkage_architecture`
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

May add a line break to make it clear as Note

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

changed

@aschemmel-tech aschemmel-tech force-pushed the aschemmel-tech-requirement-types-linking branch from cab0f61 to 4788edd Compare October 1, 2025 12:49
@masc2023 masc2023 merged commit af7e9e1 into main Oct 1, 2025
5 checks passed
@masc2023 masc2023 deleted the aschemmel-tech-requirement-types-linking branch October 1, 2025 12:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants