add linkage to process requirements #431
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
RolandJentschETAS
requested review from
PandaeDo,
PhilipPartsch,
aschemmel-tech,
masc2023 and
pahmann
as code owners
|
The created documentation from the pull request is available at: docu-html |
pahmann
requested changes
Dec 4, 2025
process/folder_templates/features/feature_name/architecture/chklst_arc_inspection.rst
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
pahmann
requested changes
Dec 4, 2025
process/folder_templates/features/feature_name/architecture/chklst_arc_inspection.rst
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
…klst_arc_inspection.rst Co-authored-by: Philipp Ahmann <2428012+pahmann@users.noreply.github.com> Signed-off-by: RolandJentschETAS <135332348+RolandJentschETAS@users.noreply.github.com>
pahmann
reviewed
Dec 4, 2025
Member
pahmann
left a comment
pahmann
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
My concern from first review is resolved. I like to wait for review by an additional reviewer.
masc2023
reviewed
Dec 4, 2025
| * - REQ_07_02 | ||
| - Is the attribute *security* set correctly? | ||
| - Stakeholder requirements security attribute should be set based on Threat Analysis and Risk Assessment (TARA) (process is TBD). For feature/component requirements this checklist item is supported by automated check: "Every requirement which satisfies a requirement with security attribute set to YES inherits this". But the feature/component requirements/architecture may additionally also be subject to a Software Security Criticality Analysis (process is TBD). | ||
| - For feature/component requirements this checklist item is supported by automated check: "Every requirement which satisfies a stakeholder requirement with security attribute set to YES inherits this". But the feature/component requirements/architecture may additionally also be subject to a :ref:`Software Security Analysis <security_analysis>`. |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is feature requirements checklist only, why still feature/component mentioned here?
pahmann
previously approved these changes
Dec 4, 2025
masc2023
reviewed
Dec 4, 2025
process/folder_templates/features/feature_name/requirements/chklst_req_inspection.rst
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
masc2023
approved these changes
Dec 4, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
add linkage to process requirements (before only unnamed requirements are mentioned)