Add SRFI 225 - Dictionaries #799
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Contributor
Author
Just added support for SRFI-69... |
Contributor
Author
|
@egallesio I see that the SRFI document does not require the implementation as a library and sublibraries.
Do I include them literally in a single file, or can I put them in Some adaptation may be needed I think (in order to avoid namespace conflict), but nothing complicated. |
Contributor
Author
|
See #867 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
@egallesio , this is SRFI-225.
From the SRFI spec:
The following DTOs are exported from this SRFI: srfi-69-dto, hash-table-dto, srfi-126-dto, mapping-dto, and hash-mapping-dto, provided that the corresponding libraries are available. In addition, eqv-alist-dto and equal-alist-dto are unconditionally exported.
So, this one usees SRFI-125 only, not 69... I hope this is OK.