Skip to content

Conversation

@fengmk2
Copy link
Member

@fengmk2 fengmk2 commented Dec 10, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added new GitHub Actions workflows for Node.js versions 14 and 16, and a workflow for publishing commits.
    • Introduced a new function getDirname to determine the directory name based on the environment.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Updated import statement for the runscript module in tests to improve module access.
  • Documentation

    • Updated the README to replace the manual contributor section with a badge linking to a contributors graph.
  • Chores

    • Updated package version to 4.0.2 and modified various dependencies in package.json.

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Dec 10, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
egg-utils ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Dec 10, 2024 0:44am

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 10, 2024

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@fengmk2 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 18 minutes and 40 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5a1d7fa and da2e23f.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .gitignore (1 hunks)
  • test/plugin.test.ts (2 hunks)

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces multiple new GitHub Actions workflow files for continuous integration (CI) involving different Node.js versions (14, 16, and 20). It also updates the README.md to replace the manual contributor section with a badge linking to a contributors graph, modifies the package.json for version and dependency updates, and adds a new utility function in src/utils.ts. Additionally, it adjusts the import statement for the runscript module in the test file.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/nodejs-14.yml New workflow for Node.js 14 CI, including steps for checking out code, setting up Node.js, installing dependencies, and running tests.
.github/workflows/nodejs-16.yml New workflow for Node.js 16 CI, similar structure to the Node.js 14 workflow.
.github/workflows/pkg.pr.new.yml New workflow for publishing commits, including enabling Corepack, setting up Node.js 20, and publishing the package.
README.md Updated to replace the contributor section with a badge linking to a contributors graph.
package.json Updated package version to 4.0.2, specified Node.js engine requirement, modified scripts, and updated dependencies.
src/utils.ts Added new function getDirname to determine directory name based on environment.
test/plugin.test.ts Updated import statement for runscript from default to named import.

Possibly related PRs

  • feat: support @eggjs/core next version #21: The main PR introduces a new GitHub Actions workflow for Node.js version 14, while the retrieved PR updates the workflow to drop support for Node.js versions earlier than 18.19.0, indicating a direct relationship in the context of Node.js version management within CI workflows.

🐇 In the land of code where rabbits play,
New workflows hop in to brighten the day.
With Node versions dancing, both old and new,
Dependencies updated, and tests running true.
A badge for contributors, shining so bright,
Hooray for the changes, all feels just right! 🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Experiment)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@socket-security
Copy link

socket-security bot commented Dec 10, 2024

@socket-security
Copy link

socket-security bot commented Dec 10, 2024

🚨 Potential security issues detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎

To accept the risk, merge this PR and you will not be notified again.

Alert Package NoteSourceCI
Possible typosquat attack npm/is-nan@1.3.2 ⚠︎

View full report↗︎

Next steps

What is a typosquat?

Package name is similar to other popular packages and may not be the package you want.

Use care when consuming similarly named packages and ensure that you did not intend to consume a different package. Malicious packages often publish using similar names as existing popular packages.

Take a deeper look at the dependency

Take a moment to review the security alert above. Review the linked package source code to understand the potential risk. Ensure the package is not malicious before proceeding. If you're unsure how to proceed, reach out to your security team or ask the Socket team for help at support [AT] socket [DOT] dev.

Remove the package

If you happen to install a dependency that Socket reports as Known Malware you should immediately remove it and select a different dependency. For other alert types, you may may wish to investigate alternative packages or consider if there are other ways to mitigate the specific risk posed by the dependency.

Mark a package as acceptable risk

To ignore an alert, reply with a comment starting with @SocketSecurity ignore followed by a space separated list of ecosystem/package-name@version specifiers. e.g. @SocketSecurity ignore npm/foo@1.0.0 or ignore all packages with @SocketSecurity ignore-all

  • @SocketSecurity ignore npm/is-nan@1.3.2

@pkg-pr-new
Copy link

pkg-pr-new bot commented Dec 10, 2024

Open in Stackblitz

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/eggjs/egg-utils/@eggjs/utils@24

commit: da2e23f

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 6

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/utils.ts (1)

12-18: Add JSDoc documentation for the getDirname function

Consider adding documentation to explain the function's purpose in handling both CommonJS and ESM environments.

+/**
+ * Get the directory name in both CommonJS and ESM environments.
+ * Handles the difference between __dirname (CommonJS) and import.meta.url (ESM).
+ * @returns {string} The directory path
+ */
 export function getDirname() {
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint

[error] 16-16: Use "@ts-expect-error" instead of "@ts-ignore", as "@ts-ignore" will do nothing if the following line is error-free.

(@typescript-eslint/ban-ts-comment)

🪛 GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (ubuntu-latest, 22)

[failure] 16-16:
Use "@ts-expect-error" instead of "@ts-ignore", as "@ts-ignore" will do nothing if the following line is error-free

🪛 GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (ubuntu-latest, 18.19.0)

[failure] 16-16:
Use "@ts-expect-error" instead of "@ts-ignore", as "@ts-ignore" will do nothing if the following line is error-free

🪛 GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (ubuntu-latest, 20)

[failure] 16-16:
Use "@ts-expect-error" instead of "@ts-ignore", as "@ts-ignore" will do nothing if the following line is error-free

🪛 GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (ubuntu-latest, 18)

[failure] 16-16:
Use "@ts-expect-error" instead of "@ts-ignore", as "@ts-ignore" will do nothing if the following line is error-free

🪛 GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (macos-latest, 22)

[failure] 16-16:
Use "@ts-expect-error" instead of "@ts-ignore", as "@ts-ignore" will do nothing if the following line is error-free

🪛 GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (macos-latest, 20)

[failure] 16-16:
Use "@ts-expect-error" instead of "@ts-ignore", as "@ts-ignore" will do nothing if the following line is error-free

🪛 GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (macos-latest, 18.19.0)

[failure] 16-16:
Use "@ts-expect-error" instead of "@ts-ignore", as "@ts-ignore" will do nothing if the following line is error-free

🪛 GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (macos-latest, 18)

[failure] 16-16:
Use "@ts-expect-error" instead of "@ts-ignore", as "@ts-ignore" will do nothing if the following line is error-free

package.json (1)

Line range hint 3-5: Engine requirement conflicts with Node.js 14, 16 testing

The engine requirement of >=18.19.0 conflicts with the PR objective of testing on Node.js 14 and 16.

Either:

  1. Remove Node.js 14, 16 testing if they're not supported, or
  2. Adjust the engine requirement to support the tested versions:
   "engine": {
-    "node": ">=18.19.0"
+    "node": ">=14.0.0"
   }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 32c2b86 and 9dcc13f.

📒 Files selected for processing (7)
  • .github/workflows/nodejs-14.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/nodejs-16.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/pkg.pr.new.yml (1 hunks)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
  • package.json (2 hunks)
  • src/utils.ts (1 hunks)
  • test/plugin.test.ts (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • README.md
  • .github/workflows/nodejs-16.yml
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 eslint
src/utils.ts

[error] 16-16: Use "@ts-expect-error" instead of "@ts-ignore", as "@ts-ignore" will do nothing if the following line is error-free.

(@typescript-eslint/ban-ts-comment)

🪛 GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (ubuntu-latest, 22)
src/utils.ts

[failure] 16-16:
Use "@ts-expect-error" instead of "@ts-ignore", as "@ts-ignore" will do nothing if the following line is error-free

🪛 GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (ubuntu-latest, 18.19.0)
src/utils.ts

[failure] 16-16:
Use "@ts-expect-error" instead of "@ts-ignore", as "@ts-ignore" will do nothing if the following line is error-free

🪛 GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (ubuntu-latest, 20)
src/utils.ts

[failure] 16-16:
Use "@ts-expect-error" instead of "@ts-ignore", as "@ts-ignore" will do nothing if the following line is error-free

🪛 GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (ubuntu-latest, 18)
src/utils.ts

[failure] 16-16:
Use "@ts-expect-error" instead of "@ts-ignore", as "@ts-ignore" will do nothing if the following line is error-free

🪛 GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (macos-latest, 22)
src/utils.ts

[failure] 16-16:
Use "@ts-expect-error" instead of "@ts-ignore", as "@ts-ignore" will do nothing if the following line is error-free

🪛 GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (macos-latest, 20)
src/utils.ts

[failure] 16-16:
Use "@ts-expect-error" instead of "@ts-ignore", as "@ts-ignore" will do nothing if the following line is error-free

🪛 GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (macos-latest, 18.19.0)
src/utils.ts

[failure] 16-16:
Use "@ts-expect-error" instead of "@ts-ignore", as "@ts-ignore" will do nothing if the following line is error-free

🪛 GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (macos-latest, 18)
src/utils.ts

[failure] 16-16:
Use "@ts-expect-error" instead of "@ts-ignore", as "@ts-ignore" will do nothing if the following line is error-free

🔇 Additional comments (5)
src/utils.ts (2)

1-3: LGTM! Good use of the node: prefix

The import statements follow Node.js best practices by using the node: prefix for built-in modules.


12-18: Verify Node.js version compatibility

Let's ensure the implementation is compatible with the target Node.js versions (14, 16).

✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more information about the implementation details and imports.


Based on the results, I can now generate the final response:

Implementation is compatible with Node.js 14+ ✓

The implementation is verified to be compatible because:

  • Uses node:url import which is supported since Node.js 14.18.0
  • import.meta.url is supported in Node.js 14+ in ESM context
  • The code properly handles both ESM (import.meta.url) and CommonJS (__dirname) environments
  • The implementation is already being used successfully in test files
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check package.json for Node.js version requirements and verify implementation compatibility

# Check package.json for engine requirements
echo "Checking Node.js version requirements:"
if [ -f package.json ]; then
    jq '.engines' package.json
fi

# Search for any version-specific handling in the codebase
echo -e "\nChecking for version-specific handling:"
rg -l "process\.version" 

# Check for any existing usage of getDirname
echo -e "\nChecking existing usage of getDirname:"
rg "getDirname\(" 

Length of output: 423


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check imports and implementation details

# Check for fileURLToPath usage
echo "Checking fileURLToPath imports and usage:"
rg "fileURLToPath"

# Check for import.meta.url usage
echo -e "\nChecking import.meta.url usage:"
rg "import\.meta\.url"

# Check if this is an ESM module
echo -e "\nChecking for ESM indicators:"
rg "type.*=.*module" package.json
fd -e mjs
rg "export.*{.*}" -g "*.{ts,js,mjs}"

Length of output: 889

🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint

[error] 16-16: Use "@ts-expect-error" instead of "@ts-ignore", as "@ts-ignore" will do nothing if the following line is error-free.

(@typescript-eslint/ban-ts-comment)

🪛 GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (ubuntu-latest, 22)

[failure] 16-16:
Use "@ts-expect-error" instead of "@ts-ignore", as "@ts-ignore" will do nothing if the following line is error-free

🪛 GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (ubuntu-latest, 18.19.0)

[failure] 16-16:
Use "@ts-expect-error" instead of "@ts-ignore", as "@ts-ignore" will do nothing if the following line is error-free

🪛 GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (ubuntu-latest, 20)

[failure] 16-16:
Use "@ts-expect-error" instead of "@ts-ignore", as "@ts-ignore" will do nothing if the following line is error-free

🪛 GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (ubuntu-latest, 18)

[failure] 16-16:
Use "@ts-expect-error" instead of "@ts-ignore", as "@ts-ignore" will do nothing if the following line is error-free

🪛 GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (macos-latest, 22)

[failure] 16-16:
Use "@ts-expect-error" instead of "@ts-ignore", as "@ts-ignore" will do nothing if the following line is error-free

🪛 GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (macos-latest, 20)

[failure] 16-16:
Use "@ts-expect-error" instead of "@ts-ignore", as "@ts-ignore" will do nothing if the following line is error-free

🪛 GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (macos-latest, 18.19.0)

[failure] 16-16:
Use "@ts-expect-error" instead of "@ts-ignore", as "@ts-ignore" will do nothing if the following line is error-free

🪛 GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (macos-latest, 18)

[failure] 16-16:
Use "@ts-expect-error" instead of "@ts-ignore", as "@ts-ignore" will do nothing if the following line is error-free

package.json (2)

34-34: LGTM: Dependency updates look good

The updates to @types/node, eslint-config-egg, runscript, and tshy are appropriate and follow semver.

Also applies to: 38-38, 41-42


71-72: LGTM: Export configuration is correct

The types and module exports are properly configured for both ESM and CommonJS usage.

test/plugin.test.ts (1)

Line range hint 1-4: Verify Node.js 14 compatibility with node: protocol imports

The use of node: protocol imports might not be fully compatible with all Node.js 14 versions. Consider:

  1. For Node.js 14: Only supported in 14.18.0+
  2. For Node.js 16: Fully supported

Let's check the package.json for the minimum Node.js version requirement:

if (typeof __dirname !== 'undefined') {
return __dirname;
}
// @ts-ignore
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Replace @ts-ignore with @ts-expect-error

The @ts-ignore directive should be replaced with @ts-expect-error as it provides better type-checking guarantees by failing if the following line becomes error-free.

-  // @ts-ignore
+  // @ts-expect-error
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
// @ts-ignore
// @ts-expect-error
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint

[error] 16-16: Use "@ts-expect-error" instead of "@ts-ignore", as "@ts-ignore" will do nothing if the following line is error-free.

(@typescript-eslint/ban-ts-comment)

🪛 GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (ubuntu-latest, 22)

[failure] 16-16:
Use "@ts-expect-error" instead of "@ts-ignore", as "@ts-ignore" will do nothing if the following line is error-free

🪛 GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (ubuntu-latest, 18.19.0)

[failure] 16-16:
Use "@ts-expect-error" instead of "@ts-ignore", as "@ts-ignore" will do nothing if the following line is error-free

🪛 GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (ubuntu-latest, 20)

[failure] 16-16:
Use "@ts-expect-error" instead of "@ts-ignore", as "@ts-ignore" will do nothing if the following line is error-free

🪛 GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (ubuntu-latest, 18)

[failure] 16-16:
Use "@ts-expect-error" instead of "@ts-ignore", as "@ts-ignore" will do nothing if the following line is error-free

🪛 GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (macos-latest, 22)

[failure] 16-16:
Use "@ts-expect-error" instead of "@ts-ignore", as "@ts-ignore" will do nothing if the following line is error-free

🪛 GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (macos-latest, 20)

[failure] 16-16:
Use "@ts-expect-error" instead of "@ts-ignore", as "@ts-ignore" will do nothing if the following line is error-free

🪛 GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (macos-latest, 18.19.0)

[failure] 16-16:
Use "@ts-expect-error" instead of "@ts-ignore", as "@ts-ignore" will do nothing if the following line is error-free

🪛 GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (macos-latest, 18)

[failure] 16-16:
Use "@ts-expect-error" instead of "@ts-ignore", as "@ts-ignore" will do nothing if the following line is error-free

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 10, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 36.36364% with 7 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 86.69%. Comparing base (c032932) to head (da2e23f).
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/utils.ts 36.36% 7 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #24      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   88.00%   86.69%   -1.31%     
==========================================
  Files           6        6              
  Lines         425      436      +11     
  Branches       53       53              
==========================================
+ Hits          374      378       +4     
- Misses         51       58       +7     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@fengmk2 fengmk2 merged commit 4ed22a2 into master Dec 10, 2024
22 of 24 checks passed
@fengmk2 fengmk2 deleted the node-14 branch December 10, 2024 12:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants