Skip to content

Update docs to use prefixed this. in templates#149

Closed
chadhietala wants to merge 1 commit intoember-learn:masterfrom
chadhietala:this-dot
Closed

Update docs to use prefixed this. in templates#149
chadhietala wants to merge 1 commit intoember-learn:masterfrom
chadhietala:this-dot

Conversation

@chadhietala
Copy link

This likely needs to be read through end-to-end to ensure we are not missing anything. This is part of the migration plan for RFC#308

@jenweber
Copy link
Contributor

I have questions about whether changes like these should merge now or be part of an "ember editions" push. @ember-learn/learning-team and @chadhietala, what are your thoughts?

@locks locks self-assigned this Oct 1, 2018
@jenweber
Copy link
Contributor

jenweber commented Oct 9, 2018

Hi! This PR was still open as of creating the 3.5 release. This means before this PR to be merged, any changes requested should be made, and then the same additions should be applied to the upcoming 3.5 version files. They will be available later this week. Sorry about the extra step!

@chadhietala
Copy link
Author

I'm not sure as these changes are related to an RFC that pre-dates Editions. In the RFC I outlined the transition path. The only parts that aren't done are updating the docs and moving forward on making this a default template lint sort of requires the docs to be updated. I would like to hear what @tomdale has to say since there have been talks about grouping behavior like this as part of Octane edition.

@MelSumner MelSumner requested a review from a team December 1, 2018 03:23
@jenweber
Copy link
Contributor

jenweber commented Dec 1, 2018

Unless someone has a specific objection to merging this, let's do it at the end of this week.

I get the sense that nobody actually thinks this needs to be deferred, we all just think that other people think it needs to be deferred.

@jenweber
Copy link
Contributor

jenweber commented Dec 1, 2018

To dos:

  • Someone needs to review the content itself
  • The changes need to be applied to the 3.5 files (or 3.6 if it gets released soon)
  • Put the 3.4 files back to their prior state (i.e. make this PR target a later version)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants