Replace use of depends_on in Traits Properties with observe#630
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
Author
|
One thing I am now considering is that it is possible other changes are having a similar effect (triggering a trait to be changed twice), but may just not be explicitly tested. I do not know if this behavior is really problematic or not |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR replaces almost all uses of
depends_onwith observe, aside from this:chaco/chaco/base_1d_plot.py
Line 40 in 99109d9
changing this line resulted in he following errors:
Details
Note that the trait is changed twice with observe.
assertTraitChangesconveniently provides the events that were triggered. Printing these for one of the tests, we see:ie the exact same event is occurring twice.
I spent a bit of time trying to understand this, but still am not sure where the problem is coming from.
For now, I figure we can go ahead with the rest of the changes and save this for another day.
Additionally, this PR also changes a property to observe
selected_masknotselection_maskas noselection_maskis defined on the class butselected_maskis (I assume this was the original intention, +1 for observe catching a potential silent bug).