Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
DZakh
commented
May 7, 2025
Comment on lines
+20
to
+29
| | Case | Description | Envio | Nearest Competitor | TheGraph | Ponder | Advantage vs. Nearest | | ||
| | ------------------------------ | ------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------------------ | -------- | ------ | --------------------- | | ||
| | LBTC Token Transfers | Event handling, No RPC calls, Write-only | 2m | 8m (Sentio) | 3h9m | 1h40m | 4x faster | | ||
| | LBTC Token with RPC calls | Event handling, RPC calls, Read-after-write | 1m | 32m (Subsquid) | 18h38m | 4h38m | 32x faster | | ||
| | Ethereum Block Processing | 100K blocks with Metadata extraction | 7.9s | 1m (Subsquid) | 10m | 33m | 7.5x faster | | ||
| | Ethereum Transaction Gas Usage | Transaction handling, Gas calculations | 1m 26s | 5m (Subsquid) | N/A | 33m | 3.5x faster | | ||
| | Uniswap V2 Swap Trace Analysis | Transaction trace handling, Swap decoding | 41s | 2m (Subsquid) | 8m | N/A | 3x faster | | ||
| | Uniswap V2 Factory | Event handling, Pair and swap analysis | 20s | 2m (Subsquid) | 34m | 2h24m | 6x faster | | ||
|
|
||
| The independent benchmark results demonstrate that HyperIndex consistently outperforms all competitors across every tested scenario. The most significant performance advantage was seen in real-world indexing scenarios with external RPC calls, where HyperIndex was up to 32x faster than the nearest competitor and over 1000x faster than TheGraph. |
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@moose-code Cursor isn't good with numbers :)
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hmm, up to means in the worst case.
20s -> 34m in the factory case is like 76x?
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We compare with the nearest here
JasoonS
approved these changes
May 8, 2025
Contributor
JasoonS
left a comment
JasoonS
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks great, thanks for the updates
Member
Author
|
Merging, but open for comments. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.