Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughDocumentation update standardizing API token naming across HyperSync examples. Replaces Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~5 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Caution
Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.
⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
docs/HyperSync/api-tokens.mdx (1)
37-70: Update line 37 to clarify parameter naming differences across languages, and verify consistency with other Rust implementations.Line 37 states "pass it as a
bearer_token" but the examples use three different parameter names:apiToken(TypeScript),bearer_token(Python), andapi_token(Rust). Additionally, other documentation files usebearer_tokenfor Rust (e.g., HyperFuel), creating inconsistency in the Rust client API across the docs.Recommend either:
- Updating line 37 to note that parameter names differ by language and explaining why, or
- Verifying that the Rust parameter should be
api_tokenorbearer_tokenand aligning all Rust examples across the documentation
|
Thanks |
HyperSync client now accepts API tokens from the
apiTokenorapi_tokenfield. The Python client is not updated yet, so it still uses thebearer_tokenfield.Summary by CodeRabbit
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.