Skip to content

ci/codeql: Fix build target acquisition#31722

Merged
phlax merged 2 commits intoenvoyproxy:mainfrom
phlax:codeql-fixes
Jan 9, 2024
Merged

ci/codeql: Fix build target acquisition#31722
phlax merged 2 commits intoenvoyproxy:mainfrom
phlax:codeql-fixes

Conversation

@phlax
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@phlax phlax commented Jan 9, 2024

Commit Message:
Additional Description:
Risk Level:
Testing:
Docs Changes:
Release Notes:
Platform Specific Features:
[Optional Runtime guard:]
[Optional Fixes #Issue]
[Optional Fixes commit #PR or SHA]
[Optional Deprecated:]
[Optional API Considerations:]

Signed-off-by: Ryan Northey <ryan@synca.io>
@phlax
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

phlax commented Jan 9, 2024

cc @mmorel-35

ravenblackx
ravenblackx previously approved these changes Jan 9, 2024
paths:
- 'source/common/**'
- include/**
- source/common/**
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could you either include the ' delimiters like it used to, or also remove them from branches-ignore below, for consistency.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ill remove them from below - that is more consistent with the rest of the code base

ravenblackx
ravenblackx previously approved these changes Jan 9, 2024
Signed-off-by: Ryan Northey <ryan@synca.io>
@phlax phlax merged commit f8941a2 into envoyproxy:main Jan 9, 2024
# TODO(phlax): Shift this to an action
compare_head () {
while IFS= read -r line; do
echo "CHECK: ${line}"
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@phlax doesn't this line affect the output of the function to include CHECK: ... as well as the output of the bazel query? I am curious since I am now seeing failures from this action in this PR because of the CHECK line. (logs from a failure here)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@phlax phlax Jan 15, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

it certainly should (EDIT: should not) be here - altho im a bit confused as it does appear to be working elsewhere - so im thinking its not the cause of your problem - which afaict is more to do with an empty line being returned

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants