Skip to content

fix: allow name to be None in BaseMetadata to handle API response #63#64

Merged
korotaav48 merged 5 commits intodevelopmentfrom
fix/metadata_none_name
Mar 26, 2026
Merged

fix: allow name to be None in BaseMetadata to handle API response #63#64
korotaav48 merged 5 commits intodevelopmentfrom
fix/metadata_none_name

Conversation

@korotaav48
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@korotaav48 korotaav48 commented Mar 25, 2026

Fixes #63

@korotaav48 korotaav48 requested a review from adubovik as a code owner March 25, 2026 14:31
@korotaav48 korotaav48 merged commit 17e2857 into development Mar 26, 2026
10 checks passed
@korotaav48 korotaav48 deleted the fix/metadata_none_name branch March 26, 2026 11:22
adubovik pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 26, 2026
…#64)

Co-authored-by: Aleksei Korota <Aleksei_Korota@epam.com>
(cherry picked from commit 17e2857)
adubovik pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 26, 2026
…#64)

Co-authored-by: Aleksei Korota <Aleksei_Korota@epam.com>
(cherry picked from commit 17e2857)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Getting metadata leads to pydantic validation error

2 participants