feat: update ValidationDataView with ValidationFlags

[jaypaik]

fixes erc6900/resources#53

[jaypaik]

• feat: fix IModularAccount to return address of the account for native functions #208
• feat: update ValidationDataView with ValidationFlags #207 👈 (View in Graphite)
• develop

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

[octane-security-app]

Summary by Octane

New Contracts

No new contracts were added in this PR.

Updated Contracts

• AccountStorage.sol: Updated validation uses ValidationFlags bitmask for compact flag representation.
• ModularAccountView.sol: Streamlined validation data by consolidating validation flags into a single field.
• ModuleManagerInternals.sol: The smart contract update consolidates validation flags and configures them using a single ValidationFlags parameter instead of individual boolean flags.
• ReferenceModularAccount.sol: The smart contract now uses ValidationFlags for validation checks and functionality improvements with modular account operations.
• IModularAccount.sol: Added ValidationFlags type and renamed validation flags to ValidationFlags for clarity.
• IModularAccountView.sol: Added ValidationFlags to streamline validation settings and improve function flag handling.
• ValidationConfigLib.sol: The smart contract merged ValidationFlags import, improving flag configuration and address-packing efficiency.

---

🔗 Commit Hash: cf43884

[jaypaik]

Moved this type from ValidationConfigLib into IModularAccount. I think it's slightly more consistent for all our UDVTs (like HookConfig) to be in the interfaces and not the libraries.

[nikita-quantstamp]

This makes sense; it simplifies things, given that we already encoded those flags. No strong opinions either way. This does move some decoding efforts to the client side right?

[jaypaik]

This makes sense; it simplifies things, given that we already encoded those flags. No strong opinions either way. This does move some decoding efforts to the client side right?

@nikita-quantstamp Correct. It does make the interface a bit more forward compatible and accommodating to additional flags in the future (or custom flags if an account wants to keep track of additional attributes).

Also, HookConfig needs to be decoded anyway (in the same struct), so I imagine it won't be much additional effort client side.

[nikita-quantstamp]

LGTM, I like the forward compatability approach for future flags

[jaypaik]

Merge activity

• Nov 27, 10:35 AM EST: A user started a stack merge that includes this pull request via Graphite.
• Nov 27, 10:35 AM EST: A user merged this pull request with Graphite.