Conversation
|
@jsvisa this looks pretty good to me, is there a reason to not mark read for review now? |
|
(noticed small error in result formatting, should pass ci now) |
|
@lightclient I have to add the tests in this PR as well(need a PR in rpctestgen first) |
|
My recommendation would be to undraft this with the spec so we can have client teams start approving the spec itself and in parallel work on adding the tests. But ultimately up to you. |
|
thanks, let's move forward. |
|
Is the intent that this RPC can target non-canonical blocks? |
I think you can query this RPC( |
siladu
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks good. Happy to implement in Besu once this is merged.
d3dcfd5 to
bb6f986
Compare
|
Approved in ACD 166. Just need to get the tests in now. |
bb6f986 to
af30c0d
Compare
Signed-off-by: jsvisa <delweng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: jsvisa <delweng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: jsvisa <delweng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: jsvisa <delweng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: jsvisa <delweng@gmail.com>
af30c0d to
9339446
Compare
|
@lightclient sorry for the late reply, now integrated the tests, which are picked from rpctestgen |
implement #393