chore(packages/tests): update bal mappers

[spencer-tb]

🗒️ Description

Note: must be rebased once #1654 is merged.

This PR should make all ELs (BAL enabled) pass all the consume engine tests. I'm not sure we need to be super strict on the exception checking for BAL. I think we should only have a single BAL exception based on what the clients are returning. More granularity would be nice for debugging, but if clients are failing for the BAL hash mismatch at the highest level (i.e not stating why) I feel this is enough. This PR is also to prompt discussion.

🔗 Related Issues or PRs

N/A.

✅ Checklist

• All: Ran fast tox checks to avoid unnecessary CI fails, see also Code Standards and Enabling Pre-commit Checks:

  uvx --with=tox-uv tox -e static

• All: PR title adheres to the repo standard - it will be used as the squash commit message and should start type(scope):.
• All: Considered adding an entry to CHANGELOG.md.
• All: Considered updating the online docs in the ./docs/ directory.
• All: Set appropriate labels for the changes (only maintainers can apply labels).

Cute Animal Picture

[fselmo]

@spencer-tb this lgtm if we want to simplify things for now 👍🏼. I rebased and cleaned up the linting errors. I was going to add the mapping in this PR as well so that we can get tests passing on hive in one PR. Didn't get time today but I will work on this tomorrow. If you feel like this is not needed in the same PR, don't let this be a blocker, I'm approving 👍🏼. I think it would be nice to go through the hive flow and add the mapping here though.

Also, I suppose this makes sense in forks/osaka... but this is messy having to recreate, rebase, etc, for forks/amsterdam with every change. Thought for another scope but we should figure out how to improve the devex here 😅.

[codecov-commenter]

⚠️ Please install the to ensure uploads and comments are reliably processed by Codecov.

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 86.07%. Comparing base (de8973e) to head (825950f).
❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##           forks/osaka    #1661   +/-   ##
============================================
  Coverage        86.07%   86.07%           
============================================
  Files              743      743           
  Lines            44078    44078           
  Branches          3894     3894           
============================================
  Hits             37938    37938           
  Misses            5659     5659           
  Partials           481      481           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	86.07% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[spencer-tb]

Thanks for fixing! Will merge and can follow up in another PR.

I was going to add the mapping in this PR as well so that we can get tests passing on hive in one PR.

Do you mean the ruleset here: https://github.com/ethereum/execution-specs/blob/forks/osaka/packages/testing/src/execution_testing/cli/pytest_commands/plugins/consume/simulators/helpers/ruleset.py#L483-L504
I'm hoping once this is merged all of https://hive.ethpandaops.io/#/group/bal will pass!

Also, I suppose this makes sense in forks/osaka... but this is messy having to recreate, rebase, etc, for forks/amsterdam with every change. Thought for another scope but we should figure out how to improve the devex here 😅.

I commented a small potential improvement here for the STEEL call: ethsteel/pm#4 (comment)