Skip to content

refactor(bloatnet): split stubs into mainnet and bloatnet files#2182

Merged
fselmo merged 2 commits intoethereum:forks/amsterdamfrom
CPerezz:feat/double_stub_file
Feb 10, 2026
Merged

refactor(bloatnet): split stubs into mainnet and bloatnet files#2182
fselmo merged 2 commits intoethereum:forks/amsterdamfrom
CPerezz:feat/double_stub_file

Conversation

@CPerezz
Copy link
Contributor

@CPerezz CPerezz commented Feb 10, 2026

Summary

  • Split stubs.json into two separate files: stubs_mainnet.json and stubs_bloatnet.json
  • stubs_mainnet.json contains only real mainnet contract entries (XEN, USDC, IMT, STR), excluding the synthetic 30GB_ERC20 contract
  • stubs_bloatnet.json is identical to the original stubs.json and includes all entries (including 30GB_ERC20)

Separate stub mappings so mainnet-only benchmarks (XEN, USDC, IMT, STR)
use stubs_mainnet.json while bloatnet benchmarks (including 30GB_ERC20)
use stubs_bloatnet.json.
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 10, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 86.07%. Comparing base (720caf4) to head (45e237d).
⚠️ Report is 3 commits behind head on forks/amsterdam.

Additional details and impacted files
@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##           forks/amsterdam    #2182   +/-   ##
================================================
  Coverage            86.07%   86.07%           
================================================
  Files                  599      599           
  Lines                39472    39472           
  Branches              3780     3780           
================================================
  Hits                 33977    33977           
  Misses                4862     4862           
  Partials               633      633           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 86.07% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Copy link
Contributor

@fselmo fselmo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't want to block process as my suggestions are mostly organizational, so I am approving. But I left some things for us to think about as I think we can share mainnet stubs across different testing contexts and I think we can DRY up duplication of mainnet stubs as well. But lgtm 👍🏼

@fselmo fselmo merged commit ece90f4 into ethereum:forks/amsterdam Feb 10, 2026
15 checks passed
RazorClient pushed a commit to RazorClient/execution-specs that referenced this pull request Feb 11, 2026
* ✨ feat(tests): test_bal_account_access_target

* ✨ feat(tests): test_bal_call_with_value_transfer

* ✨ feat(tests): test_bal_callcode_with_value_transfer

* 🧹 chore: Global fork marker

* ✨ feat(tests): test_bal_delegated_storage_writes

* ✨ feat(tests): test_bal_delegated_storage_reads

* ✨ feat(test): test_bal_block_rewards

* refactor: rebase and fix conflicts

---------

Co-authored-by: raxhvl <raxhvl@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: fselmo <fselmo2@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants