🥅 server: add retry to identity file upload#700
Conversation
🦋 Changeset detectedLatest commit: 8ee587a The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump. This PR includes changesets to release 1 package
Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are. Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR |
Summary of ChangesHello @mainqueg, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request significantly improves the robustness of the identity file upload process by introducing an automatic retry mechanism. By wrapping the upload logic with Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
WalkthroughAdds retry logic around the identity file upload flow (1000ms delay, 2 retries), removes the duplicate forward outside the retry block, adds tests covering retry and error scenarios, and includes a changeset documenting a patch bump for Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)mermaid Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes Suggested reviewers
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #700 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 64.36% 64.47% +0.11%
==========================================
Files 173 173
Lines 5391 5394 +3
Branches 1515 1515
==========================================
+ Hits 3470 3478 +8
+ Misses 1737 1731 -6
- Partials 184 185 +1
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
![devin-ai-integration[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/811515?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces a retry mechanism for the identity file upload process using viem's withRetry utility. This is a good improvement for handling transient failures. The implementation is straightforward and new tests have been added to verify the retry logic for various failure scenarios. My main feedback is to refine the shouldRetry condition to avoid retrying on non-transient client-side errors (4xx HTTP status codes), which can mask underlying issues and add unnecessary delays.
![sentry[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/12637?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🤖 Fix all issues with AI agents
In `@server/test/utils/manteca.test.ts`:
- Around line 514-645: The `describe("uploadIdentityFile", ...)` suite is
outside the main `describe("manteca utils", ...)` so its tests don't get the
shared beforeEach/afterEach mock setup/teardown; either move the entire
describe("uploadIdentityFile", ...) block inside the existing describe("manteca
utils", ...) block so it inherits the hooks, or add explicit setup/teardown in
that file (e.g., beforeEach/afterEach calling the same setup and
vi.restoreAllMocks() / cleanup that the main block uses) to ensure mocks
(vi.spyOn(globalThis, "fetch")) are restored and tests remain isolated.
In `@server/utils/ramps/manteca.ts`:
- Around line 52-71: The shouldRetry currently always returns true in the
withRetry call wrapping request/forwardFileToURL; update it to only retry
transient/server/network errors by parsing the error returned by request (it
includes HTTP status like "::400::...") and return true for network failures or
5xx statuses (and possibly 429), but return false for client errors (400, 401,
403). Use the existing shouldRetry signature and keep captureException(error, {
level: "warning" }) for telemetry; if unconditional retry was intentional, add a
short explanatory comment in the withRetry block stating that rationale instead
of changing behavior.
Issues attributed to commits in this pull requestThis pull request was merged and Sentry observed the following issues:
|
2 participants
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Tests
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.