🥅 app: fingerprint api errors with status#787
Conversation
🦋 Changeset detectedLatest commit: 8280e78 The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump. Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are. Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR |
Summary of ChangesHello @cruzdanilo, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request enhances the application's error reporting mechanism by introducing the ability to fingerprint API errors based on their HTTP status codes. This change allows for more granular and accurate categorization of errors, particularly when error messages are vague or absent, thereby improving the overall observability and debugging process for API-related issues. Highlights
Changelog
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 WalkthroughIntroduces a changeset to patch "@exactly/mobile" and enhances the error reporting utility to extract a status field from error codes and use it in fingerprint construction for API errors. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request enhances error reporting by adding fingerprinting for API errors based on their HTTP status, correctly extracting the status from error objects to generate a more specific Sentry fingerprint. However, a Medium severity Log Injection vulnerability was identified: unsanitized data from the error object (status and message) is used to construct the Sentry fingerprint, which could allow an attacker to flood the error tracking system with unique fingerprints, hindering monitoring and triage of legitimate issues. Additionally, there is a suggestion to improve the readability and maintainability of the new logic by simplifying a complex conditional expression.
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #787 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 69.56% 68.83% -0.74%
==========================================
Files 207 207
Lines 7182 7026 -156
Branches 2248 2219 -29
==========================================
- Hits 4996 4836 -160
- Misses 2003 2010 +7
+ Partials 183 180 -3
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
Summary by CodeRabbit