Skip to content

circular-buffer: Apply new "input" policy#1186

Merged
ErikSchierboom merged 2 commits intoexercism:masterfrom
ErikSchierboom:circular-buffer-input
Feb 13, 2018
Merged

circular-buffer: Apply new "input" policy#1186
ErikSchierboom merged 2 commits intoexercism:masterfrom
ErikSchierboom:circular-buffer-input

Conversation

@ErikSchierboom
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

See #996.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@petertseng petertseng left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

https://github.com/petertseng/exercism-problem-specifications/blob/verify/exercises/circular-buffer/verify.rb tells me this is correct, and git log -p -w looks reasonable. Only reason I don't Approve (in the GitHub sense of the word) is the newline at the end of the file which got removed.

@ErikSchierboom
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Newline added. Please squash when merging.

@ErikSchierboom ErikSchierboom merged commit 9013fcf into exercism:master Feb 13, 2018
@ErikSchierboom ErikSchierboom deleted the circular-buffer-input branch February 13, 2018 11:44
petertseng added a commit to exercism/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 18, 2018
The tests are the same as the initial unversioned version of canonical-data:
exercism/problem-specifications#488

This is because all subsequent changes did not change test content:

1.0.0 (formatting change only):
exercism/problem-specifications#681
1.0.1 (clarify overwrite):
exercism/problem-specifications#892
1.1.0 (move inputs to `input` object):
exercism/problem-specifications#1186

The Rust track already had most of the tests; these mostly add some
clarity around `clear` and addds a test for an `overwrite` following a
`read`.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants