anagram: Rename duplicated test case description#671
Merged
Conversation
There are some tracks that generate their test suits and use the description field as name for the test function/method.
Contributor
Great question @behrtam! I guess it is time for us to discuss how to do semantic versioning of the |
Contributor
|
Hold this for a while! I'm opening an issue to discuss that! #673 |
rbasso
approved these changes
Mar 10, 2017
petertseng
added a commit
to petertseng/exercism-ceylon
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 8, 2017
Rename duplicated test case description exercism/problem-specifications#671
petertseng
added a commit
to exercism/haskell
that referenced
this pull request
May 8, 2017
"multiple" are now specific about the number. exercism/problem-specifications#671
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There are some tracks that generate their test suits and use the description field as name for the test function/method.
If this would get merged. Do we change the version to 1.1.0 or 1.0.1?
Note: Don't know if the new names are so great but I couldn't find different ones.