-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 531
Add tests for write! edge cases in Circular Buffer #124
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
kytrinyx
merged 1 commit into
exercism:master
from
julianandrews:add-edge-case-tests-to-circular-buffer
May 5, 2015
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is actually an interesting question overall... it seems odd to me now that a
nilwould be treated differently than any another value, but I see that we're already doing this for thewritewith anil.Let's do this for now, but also be open to having the discussion about what
nilactually means in the context of a circular buffer.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I had the a similar thought. It's notable that all of the test cases only use strings as values for the buffer. If the intent is a circular buffer for strings only, then probably instead of silently failing on a
nilwrite, the buffer should throw an exception on any non-string value.If instead the intent is a buffer that can accept arbitrary objects, then
nilshould be a valid thing to write. Of course, that would make the exercise a notch more difficult since the simple approach of using anilfilled array wouldn't work anymore, but it would also be more general an correct.Since the buffer is suppose to raise an error if you try to read from it empty, there's no scenario where
nilis used to represent an empty value or anything like that.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Agreed, I like the idea of making this a circular string buffer, and to have any non-string values raise errors. We could have several tests to that effect (nil, fixnum, Object.new, whatever), or one test with several different types of things.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I could write a fix to replace the
nilwritetests with tests that check a representative set of non-string values all throw anArgumentError(or some custom exception). In that case it might also make sense to have some of the tests test longer strings (not just single character strings) just to make it clear that any strings (but only strings) are valid inputs.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, longer strings would help clarify.