fix(deps): update dependency uuid to v12 - - package.json - autoclosed

[renovate]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Change	Age	Confidence
uuid	^11.1.0 → ^12.0.0

---

Release Notes

uuidjs/uuid (uuid)

v12.0.0

Compare Source

⚠ BREAKING CHANGES

• update to typescript@​5.2 (#​887)
• remove CommonJS support (#​886)
• drop node@​16 support (#​883)

Features

• add node@​24 to ci matrix (#​879) (42b6178)
• drop node@​16 support (#​883) (0f38cf1)
• remove CommonJS support (#​886) (ae786e2)
• update to typescript@​5.2 (#​887) (c7ee405)

Bug Fixes

• improve v4() performance (#​894) (5fd974c)
• restore node: prefix (#​889) (e1f42a3)

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for endearing-brigadeiros-63f9d0 canceled.

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	0178b96
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/projects/endearing-brigadeiros-63f9d0/deploys/697dcf303322bb000871c91f

[github-actions]

Dependency Review

✅ No vulnerabilities or license issues or OpenSSF Scorecard issues found.

OpenSSF Scorecard

Package	Version	Score	Details
npm/uuid	12.0.0	🟢 4.9	Details Check Score Reason Dangerous-Workflow 🟢 10 no dangerous workflow patterns detected Binary-Artifacts 🟢 10 no binaries found in the repo Security-Policy 🟢 3 security policy file detected Token-Permissions ⚠️ 0 detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions Maintained 🟢 3 1 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 3 Code-Review 🟢 3 Found 9/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3 CII-Best-Practices ⚠️ 0 no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected Pinned-Dependencies 🟢 6 dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 6 License 🟢 10 license file detected Fuzzing ⚠️ 0 project is not fuzzed Signed-Releases ⚠️ -1 no releases found Branch-Protection ⚠️ -1 internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md Packaging 🟢 10 packaging workflow detected Vulnerabilities ⚠️ 0 15 existing vulnerabilities detected SAST 🟢 8 SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 8

Scanned Files

• package-lock.json

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 80.40%. Comparing base (79a79c4) to head (0178b96).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1222   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   80.40%   80.40%           
=======================================
  Files          65       65           
  Lines        4608     4608           
  Branches      775      775           
=======================================
  Hits         3705     3705           
  Misses        888      888           
  Partials       15       15           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[kriswest]

@06kellyjac @fabiovincenzi same comment as for the env-paths update - do we still need to support a common-js build? #1216 (comment)

[06kellyjac]

I think we could drop commonjs for v2 but some orgs can be late adopters.
It is possible to support both with a focus on modules & if we keep commonjs we could say it's just best effort & if something is broken we welcome PRs?

[06kellyjac]

there's a v13 now, I'll draft incase it re-opens

replaced by #1224

[fabiovincenzi]

Should we close this? Since we have #1224