Update header in using-packages for better readability

[ultraslayyy]

_Description of what this PR is changing or adding, and why: Changing wording of "Removing a package dependency to an app using flutter pub remove" to "Removing a package dependency from an app using flutter pub remove" to improve readability

Presubmit checklist

• If you are unwilling, or unable, to sign the CLA, even for a tiny, one-word PR, please file an issue instead of a PR.
• If this PR is not meant to land until a future stable release, mark it as draft with an explanation.
• This PR follows the Google Developer Documentation Style Guidelines—for example, it doesn't use i.e. or e.g., and it avoids I and we (first-person pronouns).
• This PR uses semantic line breaks
  of 80 characters or fewer.

[google-cla]

Thanks for your pull request! It looks like this may be your first contribution to a Google open source project. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

View this failed invocation of the CLA check for more information.

For the most up to date status, view the checks section at the bottom of the pull request.

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @ultraslayyy, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request focuses on a minor but important textual correction within the documentation for using packages. The change enhances readability and grammatical correctness in a header related to removing package dependencies, ensuring that users can more easily understand the intended action.

Highlights

• Documentation Readability: Improved the clarity of a header in the using-packages documentation by changing a preposition from "to an app" to "from an app" for better grammatical accuracy.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request improves the readability of a header in the using-packages.md documentation file. The change corrects a grammatical error by replacing 'to' with 'from' in the heading about removing a package dependency. This is a good improvement for clarity. The change is correct and I have no further suggestions.

[sfshaza2]

Yup. lgtm

[sfshaza2]

/gcbrun

[flutter-website-bot]

Visit the preview URL for this PR (updated for commit e6ff63c):

https://flutter-docs-prod--pr12838-main-4i1a8vpl.web.app