Case-insensitive comparison of architecture values #1378
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@jamesmyatt has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 12 minutes and 36 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThe recent updates focus on ensuring that architecture name comparisons are case-insensitive across different parts of the codebase. This includes changes in the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
jamesmyatt
changed the title
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- src/wled/models.py (1 hunks)
- src/wled/wled.py (3 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (4)
src/wled/models.py (1)
Line range hint
492-496: LGTM!The change ensures case-insensitive comparison of architecture values, improving robustness.
However, ensure that all comparisons of
obj.architectureare case-insensitive.src/wled/wled.py (3)
619-621: LGTM!The change ensures case-insensitive comparison of architecture values, improving robustness.
630-632: LGTM!The change ensures case-insensitive comparison of architecture values, improving robustness.
593-595: LGTM!The change ensures case-insensitive comparison of architecture values, improving robustness.
However, ensure that all comparisons of
self._device.info.architectureare case-insensitive.Verification successful
LGTM!
The change ensures case-insensitive comparison of architecture values, improving robustness. All comparisons of
self._device.info.architectureare indeed case-insensitive.
src/wled/wled.py: Verified that the only uppercase conversion is used for constructing a filename.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all comparisons of `self._device.info.architecture` are case-insensitive. # Test: Search for the usage of `architecture` attribute. Expect: Only occurances with case-insensitive comparison. rg --type python $'architecture'Length of output: 62
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all comparisons of `self._device.info.architecture` are case-insensitive. # Test: Search for the usage of `architecture` attribute. Expect: Only occurrences with case-insensitive comparison. rg -t py 'architecture'Length of output: 942
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the context of `architecture` attribute conversion to uppercase to ensure it is not used for comparison. # Test: Search for the context around the line where `architecture` is converted to uppercase. rg -C 5 'architecture.upper()'Length of output: 685
frenck
added
the
bugfix
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- src/wled/models.py (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (2)
src/wled/models.py (2)
810-811: LGTM!The code changes ensure that the "architecture" field is consistently in lowercase, which helps prevent case-related issues.
810-811: Verify the handling of the "architecture" field throughout the codebase.Ensure that the "architecture" field is correctly handled in all parts of the codebase to prevent any case-related issues.
Verification successful
Verify the handling of the "architecture" field throughout the codebase.
The "architecture" field is used in several places within the codebase:
Definition in Data Class:
architecture: str = field(default="Unknown", metadata=field_options(alias="arch"))Comparison and Assignment:
if obj.filesystem is not None and obj.architecture == "esp8266": if obj.filesystem.total <= 256: obj.architecture = "esp01" elif obj.filesystem.total <= 512: obj.architecture = "esp02"Lowercase Conversion:
if "architecture" in _info: _info["architecture"] = _info["architecture"].lower()Uppercase Conversion:
architecture = self._device.info.architecture.upper() update_file = f"WLED_{version}_{architecture}{ethernet}.bin{gzip}"CLI Display:
info_table.add_row("Architecture", device.info.architecture)These instances show that the "architecture" field is handled with both lowercase and uppercase conversions, and explicit comparisons are made with lowercase strings. This suggests that the field is managed with case sensitivity in mind.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the handling of the "architecture" field throughout the codebase. # Test: Search for the usage of the "architecture" field. Expect: Correct handling of case-insensitive comparisons. rg --type python -A 5 $'architecture'Length of output: 67
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the handling of the "architecture" field throughout the codebase. # Test: Search for the usage of the "architecture" field. Expect: Correct handling of case-insensitive comparisons. rg --glob '*.py' -A 5 'architecture'Length of output: 3089
frenck
left a comment
frenck
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks, @jamesmyatt 👍
../Frenck
frenck
changed the title
2 participants
Proposed Changes
Architecture values from WLED don't appear to have consistent case. So better to do case-insensitive comparisons.
Causes incorrect errors when updating WLED firmware on ESP32-C3 via HomeAssistant.
Related Issues
No
Summary by CodeRabbit