-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 27
refactor(sentry): optimize SingletonAspect with match expression #1049
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
huangdijia
merged 4 commits into
main
from
refactor/singleton-aspect-match-implementation
Dec 22, 2025
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
450ebcc
refactor(sentry): optimize SingletonAspect with match expression for …
huangdijia ff15010
refactor(sentry): replace Co::defer with defer function for coroutine…
huangdijia 1423d0c
fix(sentry): correct condition check for argument existence in Single…
huangdijia 384465b
refactor(sentry): clean up SingletonAspect by commenting out unused s…
huangdijia File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Bug: The condition
! array_key_exists(0, $arguments)is the inverse of the previous logic. It incorrectly executes the following block when no arguments are passed, causing an error.Severity: CRITICAL | Confidence: High
🔍 Detailed Analysis
The logic to check for the existence of arguments in singleton
getInstancemethods has been inverted. The new conditionif (! array_key_exists(0, $arguments))evaluates totruewhen no arguments are provided. This causes the code to attempt to access$arguments[0]on an empty array, which will trigger a PHP "undefined array key" warning or error on every call to methods likeTraceMetrics::getInstance(). This breaks the intended caching behavior.💡 Suggested Fix
The conditional logic should be corrected to check for the existence of the argument before attempting to access it. Change
if (! array_key_exists(0, $arguments))toif (array_key_exists(0, $arguments))to correctly append the argument to the cache key only when it is present.🤖 Prompt for AI Agent
Did we get this right? 👍 / 👎 to inform future reviews.
Reference ID:
7807594