Skip to content

Conversation

@huangdijia
Copy link
Contributor

@huangdijia huangdijia commented Feb 8, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • 重构
    • 优化了 HTTP 请求响应数据的处理逻辑,仅在存在有效响应时记录相关数据,提升了请求的稳定性和错误处理能力。

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 8, 2025

Walkthrough

本次变更更新了 GuzzleHttpClientAspect 类中对 HTTP 请求响应数据的记录方式。原先直接通过 $data 数组记录响应详情,而现在通过 $content 数组记录请求方法、URI、请求头信息,并在实际存在响应时再嵌套响应数据。这一改变使得响应数据仅在存在情况下被处理,同时保持了错误捕捉机制,避免了潜在的空引用问题。

Changes

文件 变更摘要
src/telescope/src/Aspect/GuzzleHttpClientAspect.php 修改了响应数据结构:由 $data 数组改为 $content 数组,响应数据仅在存在时添加。

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant C as Client
    participant A as GuzzleHttpClientAspect
    participant T as Telescope

    C->>A: 发起 HTTP 请求(包含请求方法、URI、头部)
    alt 存在响应
        A->>A: 构建 content 数组(包含响应状态、头部、数据)
    else 无响应
        A->>A: 构建 content 数组(不包含响应数据)
    end
    A->>T: 调用 recordClientRequest() 记录请求信息
Loading

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • guandeng

Poem

我是一只跳跃的小兔子,
代码中留下点滴足迹,
请求与响应在花园中交织,
错误亦被捕捉得无懈可击,
改变带来新意,愿代码永远生机盎然!
🐰✨

Warning

There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool’s configuration or disable the tool if it’s a critical failure.

🔧 PHPStan (2.0.3)

/bin/bash: line 1: /vendor/bin/phpstan: No such file or directory


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ad97a28 and c72c168.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/telescope/src/Aspect/GuzzleHttpClientAspect.php (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • src/telescope/src/Aspect/GuzzleHttpClientAspect.php
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (12)
  • GitHub Check: Test on PHP 8.1 with Swoole 6.0.0
  • GitHub Check: Test on PHP 8.1 with Swoole 5.1.6
  • GitHub Check: Test on PHP 8.2 with Swoole 6.0.0
  • GitHub Check: Test on PHP 8.2 with Swoole 5.1.6
  • GitHub Check: Test on PHP 8.3 with Swoole 6.0.0
  • GitHub Check: Test on PHP 8.3 with Swoole 5.1.6
  • GitHub Check: Test on PHP 8.1 with Swoole 6.0.0
  • GitHub Check: Test on PHP 8.1 with Swoole 5.1.6
  • GitHub Check: Test on PHP 8.2 with Swoole 6.0.0
  • GitHub Check: Test on PHP 8.2 with Swoole 5.1.6
  • GitHub Check: Test on PHP 8.3 with Swoole 6.0.0
  • GitHub Check: Test on PHP 8.3 with Swoole 5.1.6

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/telescope/src/Aspect/GuzzleHttpClientAspect.php (1)

74-83: 空值处理更加安全,建议进一步优化!

通过条件判断处理响应数据的方式很好,避免了潜在的空引用问题。不过建议考虑以下优化:

 if ($response = $stats->getResponse()) {
+    $statusCode = $response->getStatusCode();
     $content['response_status'] = $response->getStatusCode();
     $content['response_headers'] = $response->getHeaders();
     $content['response_data'] = [
-        'status' => $response->getStatusCode(),
+        'status' => $statusCode,
         'reason' => $response->getReasonPhrase(),
         'headers' => $response->getHeaders(),
         'body' => $this->getResponsePayload($response),
     ];
 }

这样可以避免重复调用 getStatusCode() 方法。

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8a58432 and ad97a28.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/telescope/src/Aspect/GuzzleHttpClientAspect.php (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (10)
  • GitHub Check: Test on PHP 8.1 with Swoole 6.0.0
  • GitHub Check: Test on PHP 8.1 with Swoole 5.1.6
  • GitHub Check: Test on PHP 8.2 with Swoole 6.0.0
  • GitHub Check: Test on PHP 8.2 with Swoole 5.1.6
  • GitHub Check: Test on PHP 8.3 with Swoole 6.0.0
  • GitHub Check: Test on PHP 8.3 with Swoole 5.1.6
  • GitHub Check: Test on PHP 8.1 with Swoole 5.1.6
  • GitHub Check: Test on PHP 8.2 with Swoole 5.1.6
  • GitHub Check: Test on PHP 8.3 with Swoole 6.0.0
  • GitHub Check: Test on PHP 8.3 with Swoole 5.1.6
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/telescope/src/Aspect/GuzzleHttpClientAspect.php (2)

67-72: 数据结构优化得当!

新的 $content 数组结构清晰,包含了所有必要的请求信息,并且正确地将传输时间转换为毫秒单位。


85-85: 记录方式简洁有效!

使用 IncomingEntry::make() 工厂方法记录请求信息的方式非常恰当。

@huangdijia huangdijia marked this pull request as ready for review February 8, 2025 13:42
@huangdijia huangdijia merged commit c02dac7 into main Feb 8, 2025
16 checks passed
@huangdijia huangdijia deleted the patch-telescope-aspect branch February 8, 2025 13:42
huangdijia added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 8, 2025
* Optimized `GuzzleHttpClientAspect`

* 优化 GuzzleHttpClientAspect 中的响应数据记录逻辑

---------

Co-authored-by: Deeka Wong <8337659+huangdijia@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants