-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 27
Optimized GuzzleHttpClientAspect
#837
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Walkthrough本次变更更新了 GuzzleHttpClientAspect 类中对 HTTP 请求响应数据的记录方式。原先直接通过 Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant C as Client
participant A as GuzzleHttpClientAspect
participant T as Telescope
C->>A: 发起 HTTP 请求(包含请求方法、URI、头部)
alt 存在响应
A->>A: 构建 content 数组(包含响应状态、头部、数据)
else 无响应
A->>A: 构建 content 数组(不包含响应数据)
end
A->>T: 调用 recordClientRequest() 记录请求信息
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool’s configuration or disable the tool if it’s a critical failure. 🔧 PHPStan (2.0.3)/bin/bash: line 1: /vendor/bin/phpstan: No such file or directory 📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (12)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/telescope/src/Aspect/GuzzleHttpClientAspect.php (1)
74-83: 空值处理更加安全,建议进一步优化!通过条件判断处理响应数据的方式很好,避免了潜在的空引用问题。不过建议考虑以下优化:
if ($response = $stats->getResponse()) { + $statusCode = $response->getStatusCode(); $content['response_status'] = $response->getStatusCode(); $content['response_headers'] = $response->getHeaders(); $content['response_data'] = [ - 'status' => $response->getStatusCode(), + 'status' => $statusCode, 'reason' => $response->getReasonPhrase(), 'headers' => $response->getHeaders(), 'body' => $this->getResponsePayload($response), ]; }这样可以避免重复调用
getStatusCode()方法。
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/telescope/src/Aspect/GuzzleHttpClientAspect.php(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (10)
- GitHub Check: Test on PHP 8.1 with Swoole 6.0.0
- GitHub Check: Test on PHP 8.1 with Swoole 5.1.6
- GitHub Check: Test on PHP 8.2 with Swoole 6.0.0
- GitHub Check: Test on PHP 8.2 with Swoole 5.1.6
- GitHub Check: Test on PHP 8.3 with Swoole 6.0.0
- GitHub Check: Test on PHP 8.3 with Swoole 5.1.6
- GitHub Check: Test on PHP 8.1 with Swoole 5.1.6
- GitHub Check: Test on PHP 8.2 with Swoole 5.1.6
- GitHub Check: Test on PHP 8.3 with Swoole 6.0.0
- GitHub Check: Test on PHP 8.3 with Swoole 5.1.6
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/telescope/src/Aspect/GuzzleHttpClientAspect.php (2)
67-72: 数据结构优化得当!新的
$content数组结构清晰,包含了所有必要的请求信息,并且正确地将传输时间转换为毫秒单位。
85-85: 记录方式简洁有效!使用
IncomingEntry::make()工厂方法记录请求信息的方式非常恰当。
Summary by CodeRabbit