Merged
Conversation
Contributor
Semver Impact of This PR🟢 Patch (bug fixes) 📋 Changelog PreviewThis is how your changes will appear in the changelog. New Features ✨Dsn
Other
Bug Fixes 🐛
Documentation 📚
Internal Changes 🔧
Other
🤖 This preview updates automatically when you update the PR. |
Contributor
Codecov Results 📊✅ Patch coverage is 97.37%. Project has 1682 uncovered lines. Files with missing lines (32)
Coverage diff@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #PR +/-##
==========================================
+ Coverage 77.16% 77.25% +0.09%
==========================================
Files 55 55 —
Lines 7361 7395 +34
Branches 0 0 —
==========================================
+ Hits 5680 5713 +33
- Misses 1681 1682 +1
- Partials 0 0 —Generated by Codecov Action |
![sentry[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/12637?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
Comment on lines
+87
to
97
| org, | ||
| issueId: numericId, | ||
| stderr, | ||
| json: flags.json, | ||
| force: flags.force, | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| // 4. Extract root causes from steps | ||
| // Extract root causes from steps | ||
| const causes = extractRootCauses(state); | ||
| if (causes.length === 0) { | ||
| throw new Error( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Bug: The refactoring removed explicit handling for the ERROR status from ensureRootCauseAnalysis, leading to misleading error messages when the analysis fails.
Severity: HIGH
Suggested Fix
Reintroduce a check for state.status === "ERROR" after the ensureRootCauseAnalysis call. If the status is ERROR, throw a specific error indicating that the root cause analysis failed, similar to the logic that was removed.
Prompt for AI Agent
Review the code at the location below. A potential bug has been identified by an AI
agent.
Verify if this is a real issue. If it is, propose a fix; if not, explain why it's not
valid.
Location: src/commands/issue/explain.ts#L82-L97
Potential issue: The `ensureRootCauseAnalysis` function can return a state with `status:
"ERROR"`. The refactored code in `explain.ts` no longer checks for this status. Instead,
it calls `extractRootCauses`, which returns an empty array for a failed analysis. This
triggers an incorrect error message, "Analysis completed but no root causes found,"
which misleads the user into thinking the analysis succeeded but was fruitless, when in
fact it failed. The previous implementation correctly handled this `ERROR` state.
Did we get this right? 👍 / 👎 to inform future reviews.
betegon
approved these changes
Feb 5, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.