test-backend-ops: improve msvc build time#18209
Merged
jeffbolznv merged 1 commit intoggml-org:masterfrom Dec 20, 2025
Merged
Conversation
ggerganov
approved these changes
Dec 20, 2025
Anico2
added a commit
to Anico2/llama.cpp
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 15, 2026
blime4
referenced
this pull request
in blime4/llama.cpp
Feb 5, 2026
Seunghhon
pushed a commit
to Seunghhon/llama.cpp
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 26, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Incremental build time for test-backend-ops with msvc has gotten much worse as make_test_cases_eval has gotten larger, it seems to be hitting some non-linear time thing in the compiler. This change disables optimizations for that function to workaround it.
Another option would be to split this function into smaller functions. I experimented with this and it helps, not quite as much, and is a more disruptive change that may still regress in the future. So I think the pragma would be better.