llama : fix compatibility with old 2 expert models#6735
Merged
Conversation
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
phymbert
approved these changes
Apr 18, 2024
ggerganov
approved these changes
Apr 18, 2024
Seunghhon
pushed a commit
to Seunghhon/llama.cpp
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 26, 2026
phuongncn
pushed a commit
to phuongncn/llama.cpp-gx10-dgx-sparks-deepseekv4
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 28, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The correct number of extra tensors needed is 3 per layer, not
n_expert, so it wouldn't allocate enough tensors for models with 2 experts.Fixes the second issue reported in #6379