Skip to content

Fix integration test after jq removal from MCP logs guardrail #14891

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
pelikhan merged 2 commits into from
Feb 11, 2026
Merged

Fix integration test after jq removal from MCP logs guardrail #14891

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
7a9af4e
Initial plan
Copilot Feb 11, 2026
ceecc38
Fix MCP logs guardrail integration test after jq removal
Copilot Feb 11, 2026
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
14 changes: 0 additions & 14 deletions pkg/cli/mcp_logs_guardrail_integration_test.go
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -90,26 +90,12 @@ func TestMCPServer_LogsGuardrail(t *testing.T) {
t.Error("Schema should have fields")
}

if len(guardrail.SuggestedQueries) == 0 {
t.Error("Should have suggested queries")
}

// Verify some expected fields are in the schema
expectedFields := []string{"summary", "runs", "tool_usage", "errors_and_warnings"}
for _, field := range expectedFields {
if _, ok := guardrail.Schema.Fields[field]; !ok {
t.Errorf("Schema should include field '%s'", field)
}
}

// Verify suggested queries have proper structure
for i, query := range guardrail.SuggestedQueries {
if query.Description == "" {
t.Errorf("Query %d should have description", i)
}
if query.Query == "" {
t.Errorf("Query %d should have query string", i)
}
}
})
}
Loading