-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 368
Apply container digest pinning during gh aw update and include container pins in frontmatter hash computation
#27744
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
68511e1
Initial plan
Copilot bef33af
fix: apply container digest pins during update flow
Copilot 76ac0cc
Update; rm -rf /
Copilot a21bbc3
Update; rm -rf /
Copilot 781d14f
chore: refine workflow recompilation helper for container pins
Copilot 9a7fa71
fix: include relevant container pins in frontmatter hash
Copilot d4be848
chore: refine container pin hash parsing diagnostics
Copilot 41e9a7d
fix: normalize container pin hash input to image@sha256 syntax
Copilot File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,49 @@ | ||
| //go:build !integration | ||
|
|
||
| package cli | ||
|
|
||
| import ( | ||
| "os" | ||
| "path/filepath" | ||
| "testing" | ||
|
|
||
| "github.com/stretchr/testify/assert" | ||
| "github.com/stretchr/testify/require" | ||
| ) | ||
|
|
||
| func TestWorkflowFilesForExistingLocks(t *testing.T) { | ||
| t.Run("returns only workflow markdown files with matching lock files", func(t *testing.T) { | ||
| tmpDir := t.TempDir() | ||
| workflowsDir := filepath.Join(tmpDir, ".github", "workflows") | ||
| require.NoError(t, os.MkdirAll(workflowsDir, 0o755)) | ||
|
|
||
| require.NoError(t, os.WriteFile(filepath.Join(workflowsDir, "a.md"), []byte("---\non: issues\n---"), 0o644)) | ||
| require.NoError(t, os.WriteFile(filepath.Join(workflowsDir, "a.lock.yml"), []byte("name: a"), 0o644)) | ||
| require.NoError(t, os.WriteFile(filepath.Join(workflowsDir, "b.md"), []byte("---\non: issues\n---"), 0o644)) | ||
| require.NoError(t, os.WriteFile(filepath.Join(workflowsDir, "b.lock.yml"), []byte("name: b"), 0o644)) | ||
| require.NoError(t, os.WriteFile(filepath.Join(workflowsDir, "c.md"), []byte("---\non: issues\n---"), 0o644)) | ||
| require.NoError(t, os.WriteFile(filepath.Join(workflowsDir, "notes.md"), []byte("# include"), 0o644)) | ||
| require.NoError(t, os.WriteFile(filepath.Join(workflowsDir, "notes.lock.yml"), []byte("name: notes"), 0o644)) | ||
|
|
||
| files, err := workflowFilesForExistingLocks(workflowsDir) | ||
| require.NoError(t, err, "workflow file discovery should succeed") | ||
| assert.Equal(t, []string{ | ||
| filepath.Join(workflowsDir, "a.md"), | ||
| filepath.Join(workflowsDir, "b.md"), | ||
| filepath.Join(workflowsDir, "notes.md"), | ||
| }, files, "only markdown files with lock counterparts should be returned in sorted order") | ||
| }) | ||
|
|
||
| t.Run("returns empty slice when no matching pairs exist", func(t *testing.T) { | ||
| tmpDir := t.TempDir() | ||
| workflowsDir := filepath.Join(tmpDir, ".github", "workflows") | ||
| require.NoError(t, os.MkdirAll(workflowsDir, 0o755)) | ||
|
|
||
| require.NoError(t, os.WriteFile(filepath.Join(workflowsDir, "only-md.md"), []byte("---\non: issues\n---"), 0o644)) | ||
| require.NoError(t, os.WriteFile(filepath.Join(workflowsDir, "only-lock.lock.yml"), []byte("name: only-lock"), 0o644)) | ||
|
|
||
| files, err := workflowFilesForExistingLocks(workflowsDir) | ||
| require.NoError(t, err, "workflow file discovery should succeed") | ||
| assert.Empty(t, files, "no matching markdown/lock pairs should produce an empty result") | ||
| }) | ||
| } |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
recompileWorkflowsForContainerPinsreturns immediately on the first compilation error, which can leave remaining workflows with existing lock files un-recompiled (and therefore not updated to use the newly pinned image digests) in the samegh aw updaterun. Consider continuing through all workflows, collecting failures, and returning a combined error (or logging per-workflow warnings) so one bad workflow doesn't prevent pins being applied everywhere.