Conversation
…mver.go Fix for CodeQL/gosec alert #477 - G104 (Errors unhandled) Added #nosec G104 comment to properly suppress gosec warning on line 58 in extractMajorVersion function. The Sscanf error is intentionally ignored as the function is designed to default to 0 for non-numeric version parts (e.g., "beta", "alpha"), which is documented behavior. Changes: - Added #nosec G104 directive with detailed security justification - No functional changes to the code behavior - Build verification passed successfully 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
pelikhan
approved these changes
Jan 6, 2026
This was referenced Jan 6, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Security Fix: Unhandled Error in semver.go
Alert Number: #477
Severity: LOW
Rule: G104 - Errors unhandled
Confidence: HIGH
Vulnerability Description
Gosec flagged an unhandled error on line 58 in
pkg/workflow/semver.gowherefmt.Sscanfis called to parse version strings. The error fromfmt.Sscanfwas being ignored, which gosec identified as a potential security issue.Root Cause Analysis
The code intentionally ignores the error from
fmt.Sscanfbecause the function is designed to default to 0 for non-numeric version parts (e.g., "beta", "alpha"). This is documented in the function's comment and is the desired behavior.The previous attempt to fix this (using
_, _ = fmt.Sscanf(...)) didn't properly suppress the gosec warning because gosec doesn't recognize the blank identifier assignment pattern as explicit error handling.Fix Applied
Added a
#nosec G104comment immediately before thefmt.Sscanfcall to properly suppress the gosec warning while maintaining the intentional behavior:Security Best Practices
#nosecdirective includes a clear justification explaining why the error is intentionally ignoredTesting Considerations
go build ./pkg/workflow/...passes successfullyFiles Changed
pkg/workflow/semver.go:58- Added#nosec G104comment with detailed justificationRelated: This addresses CodeQL/gosec alert #477