Skip to content

Conversation

@hubot
Copy link
Contributor

@hubot hubot commented Jan 6, 2021

@sukrosono
Copy link

no one takes a look at this? please we need jekyll 4 , it so numb if people should stay using ruby v2.

@parkr
Copy link
Contributor

parkr commented Feb 4, 2022

#791 is newer. Close this.

@waldyrious
Copy link
Contributor

Diff: jekyll/jekyll@v4.2.0...v4.2.0

Hubot seems a bit confused. The proper diff link is jekyll/jekyll@v3.9.0...v4.2.0

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants